Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: capitan_refugio
The Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Marshall still ruled, "If at any time the public safety should require the suspension of the powers vested by this act in the courts of the United States, it is for the legislature to say so. That question depends on political considerations, on which the legislature is to decide."
-- Ex Parte Bollman and Swartwout, United States Supreme Court, 1807

225 posted on 08/28/2004 12:00:40 AM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]


To: nolu chan
Bollman was about Burr's western conspiracy to form a new country. Jefferson had asked Congress to suspend habeas, but they chose not to. Marshall's quotation is obiter dicta.

But beyond that, there is no applicability of the circumstances of the Bollman case to the situation in the Spring of 1861. Lincoln was faced with an armed insurrection and Congress was not in session. Marshall could not have foreseen such an exigency, and Lincoln's paramount duty was not to wait for Congress to re-assemble.

227 posted on 08/28/2004 12:20:09 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson