Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Chickamauga; capitan_refugio
Here is an assessment of the situation faced by the Federal troops in Texas prepared on February 26, 1861, by Col. Waite, the Unionist successor to General Twiggs:

The troops in this department are stationed at different camps or posts in small garrisons, and speed over a very large extent of country. To concentrate a sufficient number to make a successful resistance, after the Texans had taken the field, was not practicable. Besides, we had no large depot of provisions to move upon, and the means of transportation at the posts were so limited that the troops could have taken with them a supply for only a few days. An attempt to bring them together under these circumstances would have, no doubt, resulted in their being cut up in detail before they could get cut of the country. Under these circumstances, I felt it my duty to comply with the agreement entered into by General Twigs [sic], and remove the troops from the, country as early as possible.

Was Col. Waite a traitor to his country like some allege General Twiggs to have been, or simply a realist?

1,886 posted on 09/25/2004 8:34:22 AM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1863 | View Replies ]


To: rustbucket
simply a realist?

There were lots of realists in that war. All those guys skulking under the bank at Shiloh were realists. I expect I might have joined them but I wouldn't have expected to be honored for it.

1,887 posted on 09/25/2004 8:43:37 AM PDT by Chickamauga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1886 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson