he hasn't changed his mind/answers,UNlike HANOI-john kerry & his band of DIMocRATS, according to who is asking.
thus, there is no reason to ask/bother him a second time, NEEDLESSLY.
face it, you are wrong & making yourself look ever more foolish.
why not head over to DU & peddle your drivel & lunatic theories there. they will, i predict, welcome you with open arms.
free dixie,sw
How can you say that? You claim he told you something. I wrote and asked him the question and he told me the opposite. So there are only a couple of possibilities. He's wrong, I'm lying, or you're wrong. Now, as for the first, he is a curator at the Smithsonian and you're the guy who named him in the first place, so his credentials should be beyond questioning by you. As for the second, my challenge stands. The e-mail address and the entire exchange is up the thread. Anyone can verify. You might not want to bother Dr. Lubar, but believe it or not, historians don't mind being respectfully approached with questions. It's what they do. Look at the lengthy response Dr. Daniel (the REAL agricultural curator) sent. That only leaves the third possiblity--that you're wrong.
face it, you are wrong & making yourself look ever more foolish.
Face it, I nailed your hide to the wall with that one and no amount of bluster is going to change the fact that the main source you relied on ("don't talk to me. talk to the agricultural curator at the Smithsonian" I believe you said), refuted you.