Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: nolu chan
"In Ex Parte Milligan, during a suspension, the Supreme Court wrote, "The first question, therefore-Ought the writ to issue?-must be answered in the affirmative."

Of course, in Ex parte Milligan, the Court upheld the Habeas Corpus Act, but limited its application to the "locality of actual war."

160 posted on 08/26/2004 11:19:33 AM PDT by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]


To: capitan_refugio
Of course, in Milligan, the Court found that the Lincoln administration had violated the requirements of the Habeas Corpus Act in all of its particulars, and found that where the civilian courts were operating, all of the Lincoln administration military tribunals were unconstitutional.

Of course, in Milligan, the Court said:

Suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus does not suspend the writ itself. The writ issues as a matter of course; and, on its return, the court decides whether the applicant is denied the right of proceeding any further.

161 posted on 08/26/2004 12:29:41 PM PDT by nolu chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson