To: Dimensio
Not a prediction of naturalism. Really? It came from design and order?
This has been falsified?
This has been verified?
Prove that this prediction has failed?
Prove it has succeeded.
DNA should not contain compressed design.
Why should this happen and for what ‘reason’?
Since nature has no morality, morality is relative only for survival.
Show that it is true and we will 'vote' for our survivability.
67 posted on
07/25/2004 1:14:23 PM PDT by
Heartlander
(How odd it is that anyone should not see that all observation must be for or against some view)
To: Dimensio
I'm gonna sit back and let you deal with this.
68 posted on
07/25/2004 2:20:23 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Here since 28 Oct 1999, #26,303, over 189 threads posted, and somehow never suspended.)
To: Heartlander
Really? It came from design and order?
You didn't say "no design and chaos", you just said "chaos".
This has been verified?
There is a difference between "not verified" and "falsified".
Prove it has succeeded.
I don't have to. You're the one who claimed that it failed, therefore the burden of proof is upon you to show that it has failed.
Why should this happen and for what ‘reason’?
Why shouldn't this happen according to naturalism?
Show that it is true and we will 'vote' for our survivability.
Once again, you made the claim that it is false, therefore the burden of proof is upon you to demonstrate your claim to be accurate.
69 posted on
07/25/2004 2:21:32 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://www.aa419.org)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson