[nasamn777]

The scientific community assumes evolution to be fact -- if one observes their actions. This is an indictment against the scientific community given the lack of evidence supporting Neo-darwinism.

A scientist may be the best in his field but if he claims to be a Creationist, many will automatically dismiss him as not "reputable".

[horatio]

The scientific community assumes evolution to be fact because it fits the scientific method. That is hardly an indictment. It has been tested, and there is evidence for it. More evidence for it than creationism.

If a scientist could find any evidence whatsoever for creationism, they wouldn't be considered disreputable. But so far there isn't any, which is why no legitimate scientific organization has taken it seriously.

The tinfoil hats that come out on this topic are amazing. There is some sort of international scientific conspiracy that prevents scientists from expressing their true views? Are the Masons or Elders of Zion involved? I joke, but please let me know if I'm not expressing your true opinion, because that seems to be a fair reading of your post.

I am forced to repeat my challenge:

Name one reputable scientific organization that does not believe in evolution.

And by "reputable" I mean one that wasn't founded on disbelieving evolution.

When the entire scientific community (including most Christian members) is united on something, that speaks volumes. Or ought to.