I should have known. If it is not Soros, it is a Libertarian. Peace to you, too!
Posted on 07/23/2004 7:55:29 AM PDT by cryptical
Marijuana Prohibition: Who Does It Protect?
By Henry Koch
Is marijuana illegal in the United States to protect Americans or to protect a handful of well-connected industries that believe ending prohibition would affect their profits?
Every study, whether privately or government sponsored, has declared the penalties against cannabis far out of line with the substance. Every study has illustrated how tobacco and alcohol do far more damage to individuals and society than marijuana. The draconian laws against this naturally occurring herb have ruined millions of lives. These laws have done far more damage during the current 66-year period of prohibition than the plant has done since its first recorded use and cultivation nearly 6,000 years ago.
Yet today, a cadre of individuals and industries is spending billions of dollars to keep marijuana illegal. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and Office of National Drug Control Policy contribute to these private efforts by refusing to acknowledge the validity of reports whose results run contrary to current drug policy. The DEA and the ONDCP even reject studies commissioned by the Congress and other U.S. government agencies.
When the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937 was passed there was no scientific evidence as to the effects marijuana had on consumers. (The psychoactive component of cannabis, THC, was not isolated until 1965.) The congressional hearings leading to the passage of the Tax Act were held in secret and considered no scientific evidence. Harry Anslinger, director of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics from 1930 to 1962, presented popular fabrications about marijuana as fact to the congressional committees investigating the substance.
Here are a few of Anslinger's more memorable quotes about marijuana:
"Reefer makes darkies think they're as good as white men."
"Marijuana is taken by ... musicians. And I'm not speaking about good musicians, but the jazz type."
"Marijuana leads to pacifism and communist brainwashing."
Industries that have a high interest in keeping marijuana illegal include the tobacco industry, the alcoholic beverage industry, the pharmaceutical industry, the petrochemical industry, the pulp and paper industry, the prison-building industry, the prison guard unions and organizations, and law enforcement organizations.
The tobacco and alcohol industries realize that when people smoke marijuana, they use less tobacco and alcohol. Nicotine and alcohol are both highly addictive. Current research has not shown marijuana to cause physical dependency.
The pharmaceutical industry knows of the medical benefits of the Cannabis sativa plant and does not want individuals cultivating their own medications.
The petrochemical industry knows that industrial hemp and its myriad products could replace 98 percent of our hydrocarbon-based petroleum. Instead of pumping an exhaustible resource out of the ground, we could produce enough hemp seed to provide nearly all the petrochemical raw materials we need.
The pulp and paper industry knows that hemp can provide more fiber for pulp per acre than trees. Plus, hemp fiber can be converted to pulp without the pollutants created by the sulfuric acid process currently used to turn trees into paper. Converting to hemp for fiber would cost millions up front but would save billions in the long run, with the added bonus of greatly improving the environment.
The American prison system is the largest in the world, with more than 2.1 million prisoners at the end of 2003. This has made the prison-building industry one of the fastest growing industries in the country. The major growth of prison population in the United States is due mainly to the war on drugs. Marijuana arrests account for almost 80 percent of all drug arrests. Having the largest prison system also requires the largest prison guard industry, and this industry depends on the current drug policy for its members' job security.
Many law enforcement organizations receive more funding from the war on drugs budget than they do from their respective municipal budgets. If the laws against marijuana were changed to eliminate arrest for possession, almost every law enforcement organization in the United States would be required to eliminate personnel.
Prohibition has never worked, and it isn't working for marijuana. According to a nationwide poll conducted by Time magazine and CNN in October 2000, 80 percent of Americans support the medicinal use of marijuana and 72 percent say that adults who use marijuana recreationally should be fined, but not jailed. Only 19 percent of respondents favored jailing recreational pot smokers. In addition, 40 percent of respondents also said that they favored the legalization of small amounts of marijuana.
Who is marijuana prohibition really protecting? Is it the American public and our way of life or is it protecting the interests of the giants of industry who have friends in high government positions?
Henry Koch is president of the Midlands chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML). For more information on Midlands NORML, visit www.midlands-norml.org.
I should have known. If it is not Soros, it is a Libertarian. Peace to you, too!
Are you really serious? You want me to take this as unbiased? When he has a link on his Libertarian website that says:
and links to this image: Wow. This is even better than WT's Soros book!
501/502 >>> 601/602
Geesh, you're Anslinger reincarnated. I'm calling this pure bunk.
And you haven't realized that the more you demonize anyone that will tell people what's in the Congressional Record, the more it looks like an attempt at ass covering? Whatever Anslinger testified to before Congress is in there. If they're lying about it, it's easily refuted. Wonder why nobody's done it?
You know you're on the record saying you smoked reefer. By making such Clintonian, parsing statements of historical revision, you only reinforce how no one can take what you say at face value. Your intention is to mislead and everything you say has to be read between the lines.
Any person here has every reason to disbelieve what you say. That is your legacy on FR.
It boils down to harm to society, and cake... alcohol which have produced verifiable and measurable statistics,
This is too funny.. I get cranky when people post to correct spelling.. but CAKE .. alcohol??? ROTFLMAO...
From one who thinks CAKE should be legal!!
ba7
of course the correct word is "coke"...
How do you figure that? I suppose you think everyone busted for marijuana is smoking it in the town square. Shows what you know.
Saying someone has lost a debate is not the same as showing someone has lost a debate, which you've not done.
The most ineffectual argument you can make on this board is the same old, tired, ridiculous platitudes which have long been known to be contrived scaremongering. Next.
Too bad spellchecker won’t consider usage when it checks.
Of course, it might have been in the context of “Let them eat cake” or “have their cake and eat it too” but I doubt it.
Where did you get "evil"? Seriously.
I've seen enough independent research in the last two years to convince me that there is no good reason to legalize marijuana -- not for recreation, not for medicine.
You [sic] hole is deeper than Zon's hole.
See the below post of yours. Then post what I quoted that you wrote and point out exactly what I edited. Back up your claim--if you can. What is the edit that you were screaming red about?
|
To: Zon
Any person can click on 16 and see that you wrote exactly what I quoted.
As EDITED by you. |
It's about both.
In 1996, Lynn Zimmer was on the Board of Directors for NORML. Dr. Morgan is a member of numerous professional associations, including the American Society of Addiction Medicine ... and he serves on the advisory board of the Drug Policy Alliance.
For you to claim that the authors had nothing to do with these pro-marijuana-legalization organizations -- well, can I trust what you ever say again?
Well, isn't "evil" what you folks think of marijuana?
And I'll bet you $3.50 that the "independent" research you have read, was somehow chokeheld by government. Remember, the lynchpin of the entire drugs = bad argument depends on saying that marijuana is just as insidious as all other controlled substances, which is why the DARE program works so well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.