Replies

Shall I take your second childish personal attack and name calling stunt as an admission that you cannot answer any of my questions?

Why don't you top it off with another of your slanderous false accusations... again.

Try this: debate the facts and arguments.

"Try this: debate the facts and arguments."
_______________________

Okey-dokey.

broadsword=Since Feb 15, 2003

BS and UR: Just because you folks obsess 24/7/365 on attacking his Holiness, the papacy, the Roman Catholic Church and do so in obvious service to the delusions of little schism of dead and excommunicated Marcel and the lightweights he left behind, does not mean that the questions you pose need engage the attention of actual Catholics to the point of wasting time responding as though there were anything rational posted by you. Marcel was excommunicated along with ALL of his illicit bishops. They and their glassy-eyed followers are in schism. That was the judgment of this pope whom you (as a consequence) despise. When he or another POPE change that, be sure to get back to us. Meantime: bray in the schismatic wilderness.

To argue the "facts" and "arguments" offered by the schismatics is to give the schism the attention it craves so that it may pick off a few poorly catechized stragglers so weak as to abandon Holy Mother the Church for such weak tea as personal and cultural preferences. That rejection is a rejection of the promises of Jesus Christ to His Church (the one in Rome, the one with a legitimately elected pope, etc.) Can you spell A-P-O-S-T-A-S-Y? You need correction, perhaps hierarchical punishment, not arguments which would give you the false impression that you are somehow on equal footing with the hierarchy.

BS: Are you jealous that JP II is a published author? It is understandable that you would probably not be published at all unless it were by some schismatic house like Angelus.

BS: By the way, you repeated yourself in mentioning "slanderous false accusations" since "slanderous" necessarily involves "false," truth, as in the case of most posts which are burrs under the schismatic saddle, being a complete defense to any charge of slander or to any other form of defamation. BTW, we write here. Written defamation (if it IS defamation) is libel, not slander. Be sure to complain about how many times I have used clearly true terms such as schism and excommunicated.

What are your OTHER FR screennames? I don't think you ever answered that one.