Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

You have no clue Deacon, but your ad hominem attacks are a matter of choice. You must stop. I warned you before, next time you ATTACK me or my faith, I will hit the abuse button again. Debate if you will, stop the attacks. They are wrong for any poster here, for a self-declared clergyman they are revolting.


100 posted on 07/12/2004 6:56:44 PM PDT by narses (If you want ON or OFF my Catholic Ping List email me. +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: narses
Hit the button. The Mods will find no attack; only a disagreement that you have no other option than attending an SSPX Mass.

Do you have other options, narses? Where do you live, and I'll bet I can find a few.

102 posted on 07/12/2004 6:59:14 PM PDT by sinkspur (There's no problem on the inside of a kid that the outside of a dog can't cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: narses; sinkspur; ninenot
The problem the other two natterers I've pinged have with you is that you're becoming too effective a poster for them to bear. They can't stand the fact that they're slowly but surely losing the argument.

Ninenot would like us to think otherwise, but he and sinkspur are one of the same, two peas in a pod. They both are in loving total communion with the homos, the modernists, the apostates, the leftist and others who have a deep hatred of the SSPX.

They ought to have an orgy already. An orgy of bankrupt and discredited ideas.

113 posted on 07/12/2004 7:14:23 PM PDT by AAABEST (Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: narses; sinkspur; ninenot; Jim Robinson
Narses:

This is a discussion forum governed by the owner and the moderators he chooses. There is a great lack of courage of conviction in anyone who claims that argument by others that one's Catholicism is defective amounts to abuse. That is certainly not the case. You want to advance the cause of attendance at schismatic Masses (allowed generously by the Vatican) which may well be appropriate in your geographical circumstances. If one's arguments begin to sink to a defense of the schism itself, then one has no argument cognizable within Roman Catholicism. It is NOT abuse to say so.

No one, to the best of my knowledge, hits abuse buttons on you. Do not forfeit your own hard-won reputation by hitting the abuse button on your critics. That you may be frustrated by those who do not accept your arguments is NO excuse for claiming abuse and no excuse for trying to have your critics silenced.

I have pinged JimRob because it is still his living room and therefore subject to his rule not yours or mine. We need elbow room here or the debate will wither, but it is JimRob's decision in any event. I do so in public and not behind anyone's back. I also do so with respect for Narses with whom I sometimes disagree but always respect.

278 posted on 07/13/2004 11:57:42 AM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson