why can you not wrap your mind around the idea of something in existance being better than you?
if it was based in our worldy SCIENCE, it could be pointed out with certainty. but it isnt.
and btw, if Theology isnt a science because we cant prove God, then Biology isnt a science because we can define Life. and thus it reasons, neither is Anthropology because we can not reproduce it, nor Paleontology.
by your exclussion of a God, you exclude the premise of Life, therefore, you exclude the essence of Evolution, which is "grow, consume, reproduce , and die"
That appears to be your problem, not mine.
if it was based in our worldy SCIENCE, it could be pointed out with certainty. but it isnt.
Exactly. It isn't based on science, so it doesn't belong in a science class. I'm glad we can agree on something.
and btw, if Theology isnt a science because we cant prove God, then Biology isnt a science because we can define Life. and thus it reasons, neither is Anthropology because we can not reproduce it, nor Paleontology.
Theology is not a science because it makes no observations, makes no measurements, formulates no hypotheses that can be falsified, etc. None of that applies to the other fields you mention. See the difference?
by your exclussion of a God, you exclude the premise of Life, therefore, you exclude the essence of Evolution, which is "grow, consume, reproduce , and die"
Another non-sequitur. I exclude only one more god than you do and that has no bearing on my view of the Theory of Evolution.