Replies

To me, when a biologist uses it in discussions about DNA, he's talking about the arrangement of the molecules, which determines their function.

This is gibberish.

What "molecules" and what "arrangement" are you talking about?

Again, the sentence I quote above from you is gibberish and utterly meaningless.

I know you will not respond to clarify what you mean because you do understand that you do not know or understand what you are trying to talk about and think that by avoiding any elaboration or discussion that fact can be hidden.

I do know what you are trying, and fail utterly, to say. Yet you are more mistaken than correct in your point.

Okay, now explain why it's gibberish.

You see, this is the difference between evolutionists and creationists. When an evolutionist says something is gibberish, he then goes on to explain, sometimes in excruciating detail, why this is so.

Creationists, on the other hand, either leave their statements hanging on the supposition that anything they say has to be The Truth© and needs no explanation. If pressed on the matter, they will attempt to change the subject by asking lawyerly questions. The latter have the added benefits of making the creationist look smarter than he actually is, and hopefully tripping up the less technically-inclined among the evolutionists.

I foresee, in response to this post, that instead of explaining why PatrickHenry's post was gibberish, you will ask me something like why I do not think it is gibberish. This will, of course, move the spotlight from you (who really has no answer) to me (and I'll admit I have no answer; it didn't seem like gibberish to me which is why I'm curious as to why you think it is). Conversely, you will simply ignore this post.

I'm laying money on the lawyerly question.

Your entire post:

This is gibberish.
What "molecules" and what "arrangement" are you talking about?
Again, the sentence I quote above from you is gibberish and utterly meaningless.
I know you will not respond to clarify what you mean because you do understand that you do not know or understand what you are trying to talk about and think that by avoiding any elaboration or discussion that fact can be hidden.
I do know what you are trying, and fail utterly, to say. Yet you are more mistaken than correct in your point.

I must have missed where you explained why this is gibberish.