Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: MacDorcha
...you have made a theological statement while excluding theology...

No. I have made no theology statements.

... "if something has no purpose, it cannot exist"..

I don't know where this statement comes from. I never made it. "Purpose" generally implies teological content. Existence need have none.

...they feel math is the only source, and they reject the idea that math had to come from somewhere as well...

No again. I know no one (except for fundamentalists Pythagoreans, maybe) who feel that math is a source. Math is a tool invented to describe the universe. It's easy to know where it came from. People invented it. I have even invented parts.

What you are speculating about gravity doesn't agree with general relativity. You should think about an experiment that can disprove your ideas. Even if such in experiment isn't feasible, trying to come up with one will help sharpen your suggestions.

1,030 posted on 07/12/2004 8:20:59 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 996 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic

"The failure of creationism to make any such testable predictions only shows that creationism fails to rise to the level of a theory. At best it's just bible-babble."

you renouce the idea of soemthing else making existance. this is where i see you saying "there is no God"

this is my basis for assuming you are secular and deny God could exist. that is a theology statement, as it attacks the idea of God.


1,038 posted on 07/12/2004 9:07:17 PM PDT by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1030 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson