Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Love on a Porn Set: One Woman's Story (ABC Expose of Porn Industry)
ABC News ^ | 5/27/04

Posted on 05/28/2004 5:25:59 AM PDT by Aquinasfan

A Mormon Girl Gets Her Start in the Adult Movie Business

Jan. 23 — When 20-year-old Michelle saw the handsome Spaniard who would later become her fiancé, she thought it was love at first sight.

[WARNING: This article contains descriptions of sexual acts that some readers may find offensive.]

"The day we met, he said, 'You're going to be the mother of my children. I love you,'" she remembers. "You know what I mean? I never had that before. I never had a guy be so in love with me."

The couple met on the set of a porn film in a rented house in Prague in July 2001.

Michelle, the daughter of a retired Air Force captain and former bishop in the Mormon Church, was an up-and-coming starlet in the adult video world. She had had some setbacks in her first year in the business, but believed her career was turning around with the Prague trip, which would be her first starring role. Her co-star, 28-year-old Nacho Vidal, was already a well-established star.

The director had told Michelle that Vidal liked her work, and when the pair saw each other they immediately fell into each other's arms, kissing from one side of the house to the other.

"There's nothing bad about you," she told him admiringly as they prepared for the shoot. "You don't know me very well" he replied with a grin.

But when the director finally got the pair to settle down to the business at hand — filming a sex scene — the tone changed. Without any prompting, Vidal got rough during the sex, slapping Michelle's face violently from side to side, and choking her. [Pleased to meet you/Hope you guessed my name]

Afterward, she looked shaken, her face reddened and her eyes watery. But she insisted she was OK. "I look torn up — can you tell?," she asked an ABCNEWS producer who was following her progress for Primetime. Laughing and wiping her eye, she turned away and said without conviction, "I took a beating today, and it was great."

'Belladonna' Is Born

Michelle had gotten her start in the business at 18, when she came to Los Angeles from her home in Utah to look for work as a nude photograph model. When she failed to get modeling work, her agent encouraged her to try porn. She refused at first. "I always hated porn. I thought it was the most disgusting thing in the world," she told Primetime, which followed her career for more than two years.

But she finally agreed. Taking the name Belladonna, like the poisonous flower, she found herself preparing for what she thought would be a simple boy-girl sex scene. She was shocked when the director told her he wanted her to do anal sex — something she says she had never even thought about before. Worried she'd have to go through with it if she wanted to work again, she let him talk her into it. "I was kind of scared. I didn't know if I could say no," she remembers. "I didn't know any better, you know?"

After the session, she was shattered. "I wasn't ready for anal sex.... It was painful. But I can hide it really well." She had just turned 18, the legal age for participation in sexually explicit films.

Michelle went on more shoots over the next few months. Then her agent sent her on a job where she would have sex with male actors in prison outfits — 12 of them. Once again, she tried to back out, telling the director it was "sick," but once again she was talked into it. She had sex — all kinds — with the 12 men. "It was really hard because I really felt like a piece of meat ... in a lion's cage, 12 lions.... I had to do a lot of things I can't imagine anyone wanting to do." She was paid $4,000.

Afterward, she says, she couldn't stop crying. She packed her bags and went home to her family in Utah.

Glimpse of the Big Time

But within a year, she was back, even agreeing to promote the prison movie that had so upset her.

She began to feel that her career was picking up. She got a small part in a movie for VCA, one of the "high end" companies that produce big-budget films, and hoped it might lead to a contract. On the shoot, she met porn legend Ron Jeremy, who was making a cameo, and began to feel like she was fitting in. "The first second I walk in, this girl grabs my breast, and I'm like, Wow, you know, that's like the best welcome ... 'cause then you feel like, Oh, someone likes me, you know?"

Another company considered giving her a contract, but at a meeting, the owner, veteran porn star Ona Zee, sensed that Michelle was not emotionally ready to become an adult star. "There's a part of me that wants to say to you, 'Run for the hills, girl, do something else, because you can be something better,'" she told her.

At the high-end companies — which produce a small proportion of the thousands of adult titles released each year — performers often have contracts and can make six figures by shooting just eight to 10 movies a year. They can pick their own partners and condoms are generally required. Shot on film with elaborate, sets, costumes and plots, the movies can have budgets up to $250,000.

But Michelle did not get a studio contract, and ended up taking a job with a company known for "gonzo" porn — sex-only, amateur-looking productions shot on video. The company, Elegant Angel, was making a film in Prague and offered her a starring role, which she hoped would show the big studios that she could carry a film.

Love Blossoms in Prague

She was thrilled at the attention Vidal gave her during the week in Prague — but wary. "It's weird to have a guy love you that much. That almost scares me because I have a hard time trusting men," she told Primetime, explaining that her first boyfriend cheated on her repeatedly and ultimately left her for a stripper. Privately, Vidal had told Primetime he could never be with just one woman, and would be happy if Michelle's attraction did not lead anywhere.

She came back to Los Angeles by herself, so sore from the week's filming that she says she could hardly walk. But then she flew to Spain to visit Vidal, and their relationship seemed to be going places. She said he could keep having sex with other women, as long as he agreed to be "honest to me, loyal, and just respect me and tell me that I'm number one every day."

She even began hearing wedding bells, telling Primetime, "The second I get married, I won't having sex with men in this business any more."

Wedding Bells

By December 2001, Michelle and Vidal were engaged. As she proudly showed off her diamond ring, saying how pretty it was, Vidal joked in his Spanish accent, "I need to f—k so many girls for that ring."

The couple was in love, Michelle says, but they were fighting regularly. Vidal would sometimes get what he calls "Latino jealous" when he saw her talking to other men at clubs. Michelle told Primetime, "It's hard to be in a relationship with someone in porn."

By now, she was working steadily, even shooting for the same company she shot the prison gangbang for. "I guess now I've gotten past the whole feeling-bad-about-it thing. I'm like, 'OK, I did it and that was pretty damn rough of me' ... Like wow, you know?," she said with a laugh. "I can say that I've done pretty much everything there is to do, and I can walk away feeling a little proud about it, you know?"

The Primetime producers who had been following her noticed changes. At 18, she had said she would never use drugs, but now Primetime learned that she was sometimes high on marijuana during her scenes. She was working without condoms, though she said the risk of AIDS was never far from her mind — or her prayers. "The fans don't like to see condoms ... If I would have said I want to use condoms every time, I really wouldn't get any work," she explained. She contracted chlamydia, which can make you sterile.

And anal sex — which she had be talked into during her first shoot — was now her specialty. "Funny, isn't it? Something I didn't want to do and now I'm known best for it," she told Primetime. No longer a fresh face in the business, she found she had to agree to even riskier sex acts to earn the same money.

Ona Zee, the producer who had interviewed Michelle the previous year, noticed a difference, too. "I said to my husband, Our baby is all grown up and left home. She's no longer the adorable fresh-faced girl that I met ... Now she's really in the life ... Even in the pictures that I see of her, she's much harder, much tougher."

Behind the Smile

During interviews with Primetime, Michelle kept the happy smile she had always had — even when describing things that many people would find disturbing. However, her composure cracked when Diane Sawyer asked why she always smiled. Tears came to her eyes as she said, "Because I like to hide — hide everything, you know?" Then she began to cry, explaining that she hides her real emotions because she wants to show everyone how happy she is. "And I'm not happy ... I don't like myself at all," she said.

Michelle confessed she often felt physical revulsion during her scenes: "My whole entire body feels it when I'm doing it and ... I feel so — so gross." While pretending to be enjoying the sex, she said, she was in fact counting the minutes, telling herself, "Hey, I only have this much time left. Don't worry about it. Get the check. Gonna go deposit it in your bank." She admitted: "You get addicted to the money."

Like other performers Primetime spoke to, Michelle said that during shooting she often imagines herself outside her body. "I call it the 'other half,'" she said.

Bringing Home a Trophy

In January 2002, Michelle's Prague movie won an award at the Adult Video News awards in Las Vegas, considered the Oscars of the adult industry. Things were not going smoothly with Vidal that day — he complained that Michelle "don't do the ironing my clothes... I still 28 and I need my mother," and at the ceremony he openly checked out other women — but there were crowds of admiring fans for Michelle and she soaked up the attention.

After going on stage to pick the trophy, she was beaming, telling Primetime she had worked hard for it. "I think this is the very beginning of my career, like I've just begun," she said.

And at the 2003 AVN awards two weeks ago, Michelle was an even bigger winner, taking home awards for best supporting actress and three other categories.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; porn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,001-1,003 next last
To: Modernman
"I am Napolean." Clearly a lie, but no evil occurs as a result of such a lie.

The purpose of speech, like every other human power, is to glorify God. Speaking nonsense is an abuse of speech, and therefore an evil, albeit a minor evil in this case.

861 posted on 06/02/2004 7:50:15 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 827 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
If you answer "yes," you must define evil.

Evil is the violation of individual rights to their persons and property.

Pornography is disordered and unnatural, as explained above many times.
If you disagree, you must offer a better definition of properly ordered human sexuality.

Boxing is disordered and unnatural, as I have explained many times using your own argument.

If you disagree, you must offer a better definition of properly ordered combat prowess. (Definition of "properly ordered" in this case: directed toward defense and deterrence against aggression.) For Part II of the question, explain how your proposed definition still allows the rejection of Roman gladiatorial games as evil (or explicitly take the position that they are not evil).

862 posted on 06/02/2004 7:51:09 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 859 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Speaking nonsense is an abuse of speech

[ TRELAINE OF GOTHOS ] You must try harder; this is too easy! [ /TRELAINE OF GOTHOS ]

863 posted on 06/02/2004 7:53:08 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 861 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Because murdering another human being violates that human being's right to live.

What right to live? Is this just your opinion? Or is it based on something else? Many people don't see this "right," like federal judges who see a Constitutional right to stick scissors into a baby's skull. What right do you have to impose your value system on them?

If the Supreme Court decides to legalize infanticide, would you oppose their decision? Would it be an evil decision? Why/why not?

864 posted on 06/02/2004 7:55:11 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 829 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
How can you possibly justify empowering the state (I don't spell it with a capital letter, as I do not consider it to be a Deity) to punish someone for taking the "proper action",...

The State would not punish the liar in this case because the lie was committed under duress. (In your case, the person harboring the Jews had three options, not answering [which would result in arrest or execution for him], handing the Jews over for certain execution or lying [which would save the Jews' lives]. Choosing the final option would be the best option given to him under duress.) The courts commonly take duress this into account, as when someone is forced at gunpoint to take cash out of the till.

...as that is clearly antithetical to the "common good"?

Lying under duress in your example serves the common good because it saves the lives of the Jews, which is obviously preferable to lying to the Nazis.

865 posted on 06/02/2004 8:03:29 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
(they turn combat prowess from its proper ordering toward defense and deterrence toward vulgar bread-and-circuses entertainment)

Football is "combat prowess"? And all this time I thought it was fun recreation.

866 posted on 06/02/2004 8:04:43 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Now, now; that's a particularly lame attempt to evade the issue.

Explain why boxing for the entertainment of the crowds is not "unnatural and disordered" by your own argument.

867 posted on 06/02/2004 8:14:17 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
The S[sic]tate would not punish the liar in this case because the lie was committed under duress.

The Nazis would not punish people for lying to them?

Mind if I borrow those history texts you imported from Bizarro World?

868 posted on 06/02/2004 8:15:50 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
handing the Jews over for certain execution or lying [which would save the Jews' lives].

That reminds me; you somehow never did get around to answering Msg#842. I'm sure this oversight will be corrected promptly, now that I have brought the matter to your attention.

869 posted on 06/02/2004 8:19:51 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
1. Morally bad or wrong; wicked

2. Causing ruin, injury, or pain; harmful

3. Characterized by or indicating future misfortune; ominous

4. Bad or blameworthy by report; infamous

5. Characterized by anger or spite; malicious

I don't see anything about "unnatural" or "disordered" in there.

These definitions generally either beg the question or "disorder" is assumed in the definition.

1. Morally bad or wrong; wicked

Begs the question. Moral evil is misuse of the will, that is, choosing evil rather than good, choosing disorder rather than order.

2. Causing ruin, injury, or pain; harmful

Disorder is assumed. Ruin is destruction or disordering. Injury is bodily disorder. Pain is disordered in the sense that it overrides the ability of the body to function at its fullest capacity.

3. Characterized by or indicating future misfortune; ominous

Disorder is assumed. Misfortune refers to evil which, again, is something unnatural or disordered.

4. Bad or blameworthy by report; infamous

Begs the question. Badness refers to evil which, again, is something unnatural or disordered.

5. Characterized by anger or spite; malicious

Begs the question. Maliciousness is a disordering of the will, which should be directed to the good.

A good treatment of evil.

With regard to the nature of evil, it should be observed that evil is of three kinds -- physical, moral, and metaphysical. Physical evil includes all that causes harm to man, whether by bodily injury, by thwarting his natural desires, or by preventing the full development of his powers, either in the order of nature directly, or through the various social conditions under which mankind naturally exists. Physical evils directly due to nature are sickness, accident, death, etc. Poverty, oppression, and some forms of disease are instances of evil arising from imperfect social organization. Mental suffering, such as anxiety, disappointment, and remorse, and the limitation of intelligence which prevents humans beings from attaining to the full comprehension of their environment, are congenital forms of evil each vary in character and degree according to natural disposition and social circumstances.

By moral evil are understood the deviation of human volition from the prescriptions of the moral order and the action which results from that deviation. Such action, when it proceeds solely from ignorance, is not to be classed as moral evil, which is properly restricted to the motions of will towards ends of which the conscience disapproves. The extent of moral evil is not limited to the circumstances of life in the natural order, but includes also the sphere of religion, by which man's welfare is affected in the supernatural order, and the precepts of which, as depending ultimately upon the will of God, are of the strictest possible obligation (see SIN). The obligation to moral action in the natural order is, moreover, generally believed to depend on the motives supplied by religion; and it is at least doubtful whether it is possible for moral obligation to exist at all apart from a supernatural sanction.

Metaphysical evil is the limitation by one another of various component parts of the natural world. Through this mutual limitation natural objects are for the most part prevented from attaining to their full or ideal perfection, whether by the constant pressure of physical condition, or by sudden catastrophes. Thus, animal and vegetable organisms are variously influenced by climate and other natural causes; predatory animals depend for their existence on the destruction of life; nature is subject to storms and convulsions, and its order depends on a system of perpetual decay and renewal due to the interaction of its constituent parts. If animals suffering is excluded, no pain of any kind is caused by the inevitable limitations of nature; and they can only be called evil by analogy, and in a sense quite different from that in which the term is applied to human experience. Clarke, moreover, has aptly remarked (Correspondence with Leibniz, letter ii) that the apparent disorder of nature is really no disorder, since it is part of a definite scheme, and precisely fulfills the intention of the Creator; it may therefore be counted as a relative perfection rather than an imperfection. It is, in fact, only by a transference to irrational objects of the subjective ideals and aspirations of human intelligence, that the "evil of nature" can be called evil in any sense but a merely analogous one.

If you're going with disordered=evil, then people with a mental illness qualify as evil.

Mental illness is an evil because it is disorder of the mind. Since the person does not will the illness, he is not morally responsible for the evil.

870 posted on 06/02/2004 8:23:04 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 837 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
it is at least doubtful whether it is possible for moral obligation to exist at all apart from a supernatural sanction

Nonsense on stilts. By the time classic Greek civilization hit its full flowering, their religion had been reduced to a set of wonder stories about the Olympian gods and heroes, rather like a collection modern superhero comic books but with less in the way of morally uplifting content -- and yet they had well-developed concepts of moral obligation.

871 posted on 06/02/2004 8:29:27 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 870 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Suppressing the free flow of ideas certainly qualifies as "oppressive, dictatorial control," don't you think?

There's nothing oppressive about combatting error. It's an act of charity.

Unless you believe that fascism serves the common good.

No, but the free flow of ideas certainly serves the common good.

Sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't. Do commie professors serve the common good?

Unlike you, I don't trust the state enough to give it the power to decide what ideologies are "correct" and which ones are not.

That's a healthy fear. And overall, free political speech is probably a good idea. Despotic regimes generally haven't come to power in "free" societies. And yet, serious problems remain. In our country, we murder 1.3 million unborn children every year. A dubious achievement of a "free society," to say the least. Obviously, it's a free society for a protected class of people.

872 posted on 06/02/2004 8:31:38 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 840 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Come on. You can say it. Four letters; starts with "J"....

Jihad? That's five. Can I buy a vowel?

873 posted on 06/02/2004 8:33:23 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 842 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
I cannot put my finger on any distinction between your approach to politics and Bill Clinton's.

I'm not surprised.

874 posted on 06/02/2004 8:34:25 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 835 | View Replies]

To: inflation
Unlike theft, murder, and abortion all sides agreed to be in porn. Doesn't that count for something?

No.

If I want to sell myself for money, who does it hurt?

You. At the very least.

875 posted on 06/02/2004 8:36:08 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
An act that is not itself an initiation of force or fraud cannot be "intrinsically evil"
Is it evil to lie to the Nazis if you are hiding Jews in your attic?

This case is an example of choosing the lesser of two evils, lying to the Nazis or handing two people over to be killed.

You are utterly daft to consider such a concealment an 'evil', A-Fan. What you consider a 'lie' is an attempt to prevent an act of force by the nazis.

Lying remains intrinsically evil,

A lie is an act of fraud. No fraud is being committed by concealing these people from harm.

yet lying is the proper action in this case, since only two courses of action are possible.

The concealment is not an 'evil' act of fraud. It is a proper action to prevent force.

Nice try at justifying your "intrinstic evil" theory, but no sale.
-- Blind obedience to an 'authority' is the evil, not an effort to thwart it.

876 posted on 06/02/2004 8:36:19 AM PDT by tpaine ("The line dividing good and evil cuts through the heart of every human being." -- Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Sorry, but you have by your own arguments conceded to the state the decision of which, if any, religion is the true one.

I must have missed that.

877 posted on 06/02/2004 8:38:18 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 856 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Evil is the violation of individual rights to their persons and property.

Why? Says who?

If you disagree, you must offer a better definition of properly ordered human sexuality.

Boxing is disordered and unnatural, as I have explained many times using your own argument.

Obviously, you don't have a better definition.

878 posted on 06/02/2004 8:40:33 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Explain why boxing for the entertainment of the crowds is not "unnatural and disordered" by your own argument.

Because it's fun?

879 posted on 06/02/2004 8:41:45 AM PDT by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan

Nope. Four letters, name of a religion, proves that you were wrong in Msg#839. I think that's enough hints....


880 posted on 06/02/2004 8:41:55 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 873 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 1,001-1,003 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson