To: tacticalogic; robertpaulsen
Funny, I don't ever recall anyone at RLC saying "Who's to say that 'substantial effects' isn't the correct interpretation".RP said that he was an RLC type except for the WOD.
This distinguishes him from the great majority of pro-WOD FReepers who think that Ron Paul is more of a threat to America than Democrats. He also does not hail every unconstitutional social program tht the Bush administration supports, which is another charactaristic of the drug warriors.
76 posted on
05/12/2004 3:44:52 PM PDT by
jmc813
(Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
To: jmc813; robertpaulsen
I'd be a little more convinced of that if he'd support a constitutional amendment for the drug war, and an end to the New Deal interpretation of the Commerce Clause. As it is, he opposes the unconstitutional federal social programs and bureaucratic intrusion into people's lives in practice, but tacitly supports it in principle. IMHO
77 posted on
05/12/2004 3:53:19 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson