[Howlin]

Well, that's what I'm so confused about; the "excessive" part.

If "excessive partisanship" is so bad, am I just suppose to vote for Bush and not say anything about it?

Or is it "excessive" because it's Bush?

[Dane]

If "excessive partisanship" is so bad, am I just suppose to vote for Bush and not say anything about it?

I suppose so. I surmise it is excessive to heads if you point out why your candidate is the best person for the job, taking into account everything from experience, stance on issues, and electability.

[singfreedom]

You've raised a great point. I have to agree, at this particular juncture, President Bush is the best choice for conservatives. He is NOT going to please all of us all the time. That would be impossible and it would also be very unrealistic not to realize that he is going to have to make some compromises. Like it or not, our form of government is based on COMPROMISE! It is the thing which separates is from the "terrorist crazies". We can compromise, but not on President Bush. Right now, he's our best hope!

[singfreedom]

You've raised a great point. I have to agree, at this particular juncture, President Bush is the best choice for conservatives. He is NOT going to please all of us all the time. That would be impossible and it would also be very unrealistic not to realize that he is going to have to make some compromises. Like it or not, our form of government is based on COMPROMISE! It is the thing which separates is from the "terrorist crazies". We can compromise, but not on President Bush. Right now, he's our best hope!