Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Vernon
So you reject the contention that the original manuscripts were inerrant?
229 posted on 02/09/2004 5:01:31 PM PST by drstevej (THttABTSFitIotCRbtLaDJC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: drstevej
That is NOT what I said, and you know it. So tell me, which version/translation or whatever do you consider as inspired and inerrant as the autographs? Not playing your games, sir.
231 posted on 02/09/2004 5:07:06 PM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

To: drstevej
On "Inspiration," I guess you want to get into the nonsense debate about whether they were "verbal," "plenary verbal," "reflective verbal," or whatever.
232 posted on 02/09/2004 5:09:01 PM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson