To: Vernon
So you reject the contention that the original manuscripts were inerrant?
229 posted on
02/09/2004 5:01:31 PM PST by
drstevej
(THttABTSFitIotCRbtLaDJC)
To: drstevej
That is NOT what I said, and you know it. So tell me, which version/translation or whatever do you consider as inspired and inerrant as the autographs? Not playing your games, sir.
231 posted on
02/09/2004 5:07:06 PM PST by
Vernon
(Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
To: drstevej
On "Inspiration," I guess you want to get into the nonsense debate about whether they were "verbal," "plenary verbal," "reflective verbal," or whatever.
232 posted on
02/09/2004 5:09:01 PM PST by
Vernon
(Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson