Replies

Again, the worst choice might be the guy currently in office. Bush's spending and disregard for the Constution has been so far unprecedented by nearly all in the last century save for FDR. Tolerating a Democrat for 4 years in order to determine the course we must take is an easy choice for me. When I find myself agreeing with Democrat candidates more than the current Republican president it is time for radical steps to be taken. Bush has taken us so far down the road of big government, imperialism, and Constitutional irrelevance that it is hard to believe a Democrat could be any worse. Therefore it is no problem to use this vote to send the RNC a message.

Not to mention that a Democrat being elected in office (Kerry) in 2004 would have an economy that is ramping up working in his favor and it is unlikely that it would crater by 2008, thus the Democrat (Kerry) would have a greater chance for re-election in 2008, effectively locking Hillary Clinton OUT from EVER running for President. The soonest she'd be able to run would be 2012 and she'd be age 65 then and I find it highly unlikely that Americans would vote a woman that old into the highest office of the land.