2/3rds of the al Queda leadership is either dead or captured. Their money is drying up. We aren't allowing "alleged" charitable orgnizations to collect money in the US and then funneling it into terrorist orgnizations. We called the Saudi's on their actions and alleged charitible contributions (we exposed the *royals* who were doing it). It has caused tangible declines in contributions to the terrorist coffers. They are hurting "big time" in case you haven't been following these things.
We have captured or killed all but what "5" now of the deck of cards in Iraq?
Now that "Saddam & Son's" is gone the PLO and Arafat have had to BORROW money to pay their staff. No one is paying $25,000 per suicide bomber to the remaining family members.
How's that for beginners.. need more or would you like to do some of your own research? ~Or~ do you require some more spoon feedings?
When you act mamby pamby with terrorist they think we run.. per OBL! I've noticed he isn't out in public much these days.
2/3rds of the al Queda leadership is either dead or captured. But 1/3rd isn't, if those numbers are to believed.
Nonetheless, if this was a war against Al Queda, you've made a strong case that 'we are winning'.
But it's a "war against terror". Terror is not Al Queda. It is not Iraq. It is a tactic that has been used throughout the history of mankind.
So at what point is it officially "won"? Or is it perpetual?