To: FSPress
The only ones who have avoided the question are you and Philip. You asked me the same question, I answered it, without insulting your integrity as a FReeper or mischaracterizing you as a liberal. Frankly, I consider those like you to be a disruptor rather than a debater, much less a Conservative. If you want the unvarnished truth as to what I think of you. You're a liberal. Liberals by design are disruptors. Conservatives are armed with facts and truth and don't need to dodge what confronts them. Those who dodge the issues are by-and-large Liberals. I've answered my question for you. I'm against the AWB, and I've detailed my reasons why in a previous post. What say you? Are you going to dodge yet again ya damn Liberal?
517 posted on
02/01/2004 8:35:31 AM PST by
BigSkyFreeper
(All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
To: BigSkyFreeper
Okay, for the record, I am against all gun laws presently on the books both on the federal level and the state and local level as well. I will also vote against anyone who helps enact or extend any law dealing with guns, their ammunition or import or export of same unless the act is to repeal an existing law.
Now which gun laws are you for?
520 posted on
02/01/2004 8:43:01 AM PST by
FSPress
To: BigSkyFreeper
>> The only ones who have avoided the question are you and Philip.
No one avoided the question, lefty. You just asked a completely stupid, assinine question, and deserved to be bashed. My primary reasoning for opposing the assault weapons ban is that it follows the "disarm the peasants" mentality of the typical tyrant, which means it restricts my right to protect myself and my family from criminals in and out of government. The second reason is, "It is unconstitutional" (which I mentioned in my reply in #519).
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson