To: NewRomeTacitus
I don't agree with everything Bush has done, either, but I've measured his actions in light of the liberalism of our general public and the horrifying danger facing our country if Democrats get back into control... in light of those problems, taking a few spending programs I wouldn't pass myself are minor issues.
Is he fulfilling his fathers unfulfilled mission of pushing America into a U.N.-dominated New World Order or does he have our countrys best interests at heart? I wish I had a clue.
Are you seriously being honest with that statement? How could there be any question? Bush has done more to squirm us out from under the thumb of International authority than any President since Reagan and he has firmly given the finger to old Europe, the Security Council and the U.N. in general. Kofi Annan appears to despise Bush and it's crystal clear Bush is no fan of the U.N. himself.
334 posted on
02/01/2004 12:05:13 AM PST by
Tamzee
(W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
To: Tamsey
The tinfoilers, who worry so about the NWO, the Illuminati, the Buildyourownburgers, the Tri-lats, the Masons, and the joooooooooooos,should go get some antidepressants, Lithium, and/or A nice soothing cup of chamomile tea. :-)
To: Tamsey
Tamsey you are slowly uncovering the real truth here. There is only one thing wrong with GW in the far right's eye. It is not spending, it is not "liberalism", it is not anything beyond the fact that he is the son of GHW Bush. The far right turned on Reagan when he chose Bush 1 as his VP and have been on a vendetta ever since. The Bush name is despised in the Bircher world of "true conservatives".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson