Skip to comments.
The Paradox of Unified Control–How Conservatives Can Win Without Bush
Vanity
| 1/31/2004
| Self
Posted on 01/31/2004 3:07:29 PM PST by Kevin Curry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,961-1,963 next last
To: Mo1
You are a fool
Good gravy. Either debate the point, concede defeat, or move on. I thought personal attacks weren't allowed around here anymore.
221
posted on
01/31/2004 10:01:28 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Tench_Coxe; Kevin Curry
Kevin -- What gets missed is that the system of government in the US was purposely set up to create a gridlock of sorts. There is an intricate set of checks and balances.
63
____________________________________
The constitutional checks/balances aren't working..
Kevin proposes that we try to substitute a contrarian political check on the balance of power.
Works for me..
222
posted on
01/31/2004 10:03:19 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: Kevin Curry
I just read your post and I think it is brilliant. I have advocated that if Hillary is not running this year it may be beneficial for someone like Kerry to win to keep Hillary off the stage for maybe eight years. If Hillary gets the nomination though by a brokered convention this summer all the analysis changes and must be rethought.
To: TomasUSMC
then we do change our minds and vote for Bush. Who is "we"?
To: Kevin Curry
I remember a republican telling Hannity that:
The reason we can't get our judges through is because we have too many Rinos. At least ten republicans said they would not vote to change the filibuster rules. All we needed was 51. We have 51. But many are Rinos.
And more compassionate conservatism will bring in more Rinos. It basically comes down to the Pro Life Issue. If a judge is Pro Life, rinos will not support, even a republican appointment. More compassion means really much less compassion because compassion without courage in cowardliness.
225
posted on
01/31/2004 10:04:42 PM PST
by
TomasUSMC
(from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
To: Antoninus
There, there, yes, yes, you jujst keepn right on listening to/reading the toe suckert and believeing every word he says.
You ask what hold the Ckintons would have over Kerry and Edwards. I gave you a funny/sarcastic answser. You swallowed the bait and believe little Dickie Morris' views.
The fact is, Rudy wants to be governor far more than just the JUNIOR Senator from N.Y. band he may even harbor a wish to become president. He isn't all that happy about Bloomy, so he might even think about being mayor again. At this point in time, no one, not even he, knows in which direction he's going to take, or if he'll take on another elected office at all.
The Clintons rule the DNC because they bring in money, McAwful is their enforcer.
To: tpaine
It's interesting to watch Conservatives advocate supporting candidates who's main campaingn promises are to repeal Bush's tax cuts. I must assume that he support for Kerry really means these guys like Kerry's positions.
227
posted on
01/31/2004 10:06:21 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: TomasUSMC
Like a spoiled chikld, you're demanding what.........a WALL, or you'll bolt ? All or nothing demands get you NOTHING and usually in spades.
To: Final Authority
If Hillary gets the nomination though by a brokered convention this summer all the analysis changes and must be rethought.
Rethougth? Nothing would energize the conservative base more than Hitlery on the ticket. After all I've said here tonight, I'll admit that if my choice was between Hitlery and GWB, I'd be manning the phone banks and putting up signs for the president just to keep the witch out.
229
posted on
01/31/2004 10:08:24 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Neets
Foul ball.
230
posted on
01/31/2004 10:08:36 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: TomasUSMC
At least ten republicans said they would not vote to change the filibuster rulesOnly ten? Just damn. The Democrats want the filibuster rules changed. Yeah, we needed 51, we had 51, the Democrats said the rules should change that we need 2/3 majority, yet the judges were still filibustered. The Democrats notoriously have never liked the rules, they're always trying to change the rules.
231
posted on
01/31/2004 10:09:40 PM PST
by
BigSkyFreeper
(All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
To: Zipporah
bump for later
232
posted on
01/31/2004 10:09:40 PM PST
by
Bernard Marx
(In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice there is.)
To: Final Authority
Assuming Kevin gets his gridlock and the GOP maintains control of congress it would only last 2 years. Just long enough for the GOP to be perceived as obstructionist and Kerry calling for a congress that will "help him do the work of the people". "Gridlock" is a holding action at best and a potential disaster in the mid term elections for those doing the grid locking.
To: nopardons
There, there, yes, yes, you jujst keepn right on listening to/reading the toe suckert and believeing every word he says.
Honestly, I had no idea Morris said that. If so, he's stealing my material.
In fact, I find the man odious and Toricelli-like. I can't stand the sight or sound of him.
234
posted on
01/31/2004 10:10:57 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Kevin Curry
His sycophants--his ever-approving greek chorus--are next to worthless in terms of shaping the debate.
You know who you are.
117
_____________________________________
Well said bump.
235
posted on
01/31/2004 10:11:41 PM PST
by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but the U.S. Constitution defines a conservative. (writer 33
)
To: Antoninus
Then, when you find yourself thinking like him............. CHANGE YOUR MIND !
To: nopardons
The Clintons rule the DNC because they bring in money, McAwful is their enforcer.
Uh, that's what I said. But once they're no longer at the top of the heap, their ability to draw in money will go down. A sitting president is always the top money raiser. It's axiomatic, I'm afraid.
237
posted on
01/31/2004 10:13:14 PM PST
by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
To: Texasforever
Exactly so, but it's little use attempting to force feed the UNAPPEASABLES actual facts. :-(
To: Antoninus
Good gravy. Either debate the point, concede defeat, or move on I have tried .. yet you still think it's okay to put a commie in office .. whether it be Kerry or Edwards
239
posted on
01/31/2004 10:14:29 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
To: CMAC51
Some people say that there are Two truths. The Democrat base will support their party no matter what it does and the Republican base will abandon their party no matter what it does.
How about the Democratic Party will never abandon its base. No matter what the Democratic Party will not spend a cent, and not allow a word to be spoken for Pro-life. It will always be Pro-Abortion, always be Pro homosexual agenda, always be Pro Illegal Immigrant. Always.
Now the Gop well you could say the Gop will always be Pro Illegal Immigrant too.
So it is not the Base that abandons the Party. It is the Party that abandons the base.
In this country, at least since 1776,
It is not the responsibility of the people to represent the will of the President. It is the responsibility of the President to represent the will of the people.
The Republican Leadership continues to abandon US. In doing so, THEY abandon the White House.
No Borders No Vote Seven Months
240
posted on
01/31/2004 10:14:46 PM PST
by
TomasUSMC
(from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,961-1,963 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson