When facts are on my side, and somebody tries to argue from a position of ignorance, I am superior to them... Because I'm right.
How do I say this, you ask? Well, since this seems to be the thread where words must be defined, here goes:
Main Entry: [1]su·pe·ri·or
Pronunciation: su-'pir-E-&r
Function: adjective
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French superieur, from Latin superior, comparative of superus upper, from super over, above more at OVER
Date: 14th century 1 : situated higher up : UPPER
2 : of higher rank, quality, or importance
3 : courageously or serenely indifferent (as to something painful or disheartening) 4 a : greater in quantity or numbers b : excellent of its kind : BETTER 5 : being a superscript
6 a : of an animal structure : situated above or anterior or dorsal to another and especially a corresponding part b : of a plant structure : situated above or near the top of another part: as (1) : of a calyx : attached to and apparently arising from the ovary (2) : of an ovary : free from the calyx or other floral envelope
7 : more comprehensive
Hmmm.... Since none of the Bush die-hards (who will look the other way as we discuss the elimination of our national sovereignty) want to talk about facts, historical inferences (like in countries where this idiocy has been attempted) or common-sense, it therefore infers that, compared to you, I am superior. By definition. It's a matter of fact, not ego.
I do enjoy watching the young and pompous make public fools of themselves, as you have here.
Give me a ring when you grow up, and begin to understand how little you really know.