This cute little slam is evidence that you don't have an original thought in your head.
It is the most idiotic accusation you tunnel visioned extremists dish out. Give it up.
Actually, without "bashing" Bush, a good argument can be made otherwise.
Bush has changed the nature of the debate. Reagan got people to consider the 'government isn't the solution. It's part of the problem.' He changed the question from 'what's the best way for government to handle such and so problem?' to 'should the government be involved in dealing with such and so?'
Bush has walked away from the Reagan approach and returned to the older Republican approach of 'we do it better'. For conservatives, like me, who believe in limited government, for all of Bush's fine character and integrity, he has done serious damage to the idea of limited government.
So, I suppose it depends on what your "agenda" is.