Skip to comments.
Bush-Bashing Conservatives Should Focus on the Big Picture
GOPUSA.com ^
| Januray.26,2004
| Bobby Eberle
Posted on 01/26/2004 1:47:29 PM PST by Reagan Man
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 661 next last
To: Capitalist Eric
I can only assume by your silence that you let your emotion over ride self control. Maybe next time you will think twice about advocating the possibility of the death penalty for a sitting president based on a damned immigration proposal.
To: Dane
Alright, jerk, here we go with your empty attacks, based
entirely in ignorance:
So you like the satus quo?
I don't remember saying that. Please post a link to my statement of this. If you can't do it, you're a liar.
Anyway it is up to congress to make the decision.
No kidding! Who would have guessed that I said that back in post #47??? But then, you did read that, right???
Clinton would have issued an executive order giving amnesty. I guess you think that is better.
I don't remember saying that. Please post a link to my statement of this. If you can't do it, you're a liar. Oh, and neither Clinton nor Bush dares to pass this as an EO. It would be political suicide.
BTW, IMO, you seem to be the kool-aid drinker with your distortion of the facts.
Post my "distortion of the facts, or admit you're a liar.
Also BTW, what is your plan to round 10 million. You may say round up 10,000 and they will go away on their own. No they won't.
I don't remember saying that. Please post a link to my statement of this. If you can't do it, you're a liar.
The reason they are here is to make a better life for themselves. Put pressure on Mexico to gets its economy in gear and they wouldn't be here, but you seem to be of the ilk that a twitch of the nose and poof they all are gone.
Do you have any data to support this claim, or is this just more flatulence? Given your obvious lack of knowledge concerning economics, it seems more flatuelence, than anything else. And don't worry, I won't hold my breath waiting for your citations to economic policy analyses supporting these BS conclusions of yours.
JMO, you are being simplistic, reactionary, and knee jerk.
You opinion- as clearly demonstrated- isn't worth anything.
Yada, yada, yada. If you think there are no differences between Bush and the demos, you are mistaken. I guess you would like to have the UN and Kofi Annan run US foreign policy, which would happen under a demo President. And I guess you like the tax hikes a demo would bring.
I don't remember saying that. Please post a link to my statement of this. If you can't do it, you're a liar.
But you keep on ranting endlessly Eric, that seems to be your strong suit.
I recall an expression about a pot, and a kettle...
As I stated before: I don't feel the need to restate myself over and over, for every bum who is too lazy to read the thread, and suddenly jumps on me because he can't be bothered to read.
Oh now playing the victim card. A democrat card.
You know, you have a real problem with facts. Look towards the top, something about policy being written in Congress, and my referring to that back in post #47, which you obviously were too lazy to read, before trying to put words in my mouth... So now, whenever someone says "don't go there, you'll make a fool of yourself," you automatically assume they're playing a democrat card? How stupid are you???
My words: If you try to harangue me from a foundation of ignorance, then I'll just ignore you- stupid people aren't worth my time.
Sure seems that you spend a lot time with yourself.
The moderators have asked me to be a little more kind to the mental midgets. They don't like it when I slap down some fool... Guys that can't find their anus with both hands, a flashlight and a set of written instructions annoy me, and I tend to be unkind with them.
Especially when I can easily demonstrate that they're just bloviating.
You're now DISMISSED.
222
posted on
01/27/2004 1:28:02 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Texasforever
You challenged me, on the question of treason.
I provided you an answer to your challenge.
It's now YOUR turn to answer my challenge. And I'm still waiting...
223
posted on
01/27/2004 1:29:36 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Texasforever
Maybe next time you will think twice about advocating the possibility of the death penalty for a sitting president based on a damned immigration proposal.
I don't remember saying that. Please post a link to my statement of this. If you can't do it, you're a liar.
224
posted on
01/27/2004 1:32:05 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Capitalist Eric
You're now DISMISSED. JMO, but you are suffering with Wesley Clark syndrome with your hubris.
225
posted on
01/27/2004 1:33:46 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Texasforever
Come on you little jerk. Back your charges up.Any more FReepmails like the above will be construed as harassment.
And as I said, I played your game, I answered your challenge. It's your turn.
Don't worry, though... I won't hold my breath.
226
posted on
01/27/2004 1:37:20 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Capitalist Eric
It's now YOUR turn to answer my challenge. And I'm still waiting... Should Bush be tried for treason and if found guilty be subject to capial punishmment?
To: Capitalist Eric
Any more FReepmails like the above will be construed as harassment. Should Bush be subject to the death penalty for an immigration proposal?
To: Capitalist Eric
I don't remember saying that. Please post a link to my statement of this. If you can't do it, you're a liar. You accused Bush of treason. That is a capital crime so, yes you did say that. Do you want to retract it now?
To: Capitalist Eric
Any more FReepmails like the above will be construed as harassment. Poor baby. Should Bush be tried for treason?
To: Reagan Man
Some people say,"The best hope for the immigration issue and border security is for conservatives to work diligently for President Bush's reelection and to DEMAND sensible immigration reform from members of Congress."
We have been DEMANDING constantly for how many decades? What has demanding got us. Nada. Nofin. Nothing. We have demanded it from democrats and republicans. We have demanded it when we were in power and when we were not. We have even, even demanded it during a time of unprecedented terror in this country. We have demanded it during this War on Terror. Demanding has not and will not work - ever.
You see - you can't demand something if you can't answer the followup question. That question is and has been the same all these years, " Well what are you going to do if we still don't control the borders and deport the Illegals? Well? What are you going to do tough guy. You say your gonna demand, well go ahead and demand all day and all stinking night, and all week and all year because -
What are you conservatives going to do about it? What?
Well guess what? We the conservatives have decided that we are Now going to back up our demands with action. Look at the polls if you don't believe U.S. El Presidente is now losing to Kerry if he is nominated. This drop did not happen out of coincidence.
Mr. President Bush, if you don't stop with the amnesty, then you will not stop with your drop in the polls.
We are finished demanding, we are now acting, we will not vote for George Bush for President until he rescinds the Amnesty Plan. Period.
Guess what GOP, now you can do the demanding. This time we are the ones that will ask the question?
What are you going to do about it GOP, what?
231
posted on
01/27/2004 1:45:39 AM PST
by
TomasUSMC
(from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
To: Texasforever
(((yawn...)))
I won't allow myself to be dragged into your asinine argument. It may work with your ankle-biters, to lure someone into a false debate, based on something that you claim was said? That's like debating the local gossip, the he-said, she-said idiocy that passes for social discussion in a little podunk town... What makes you think any of the rest of us are so stupid as to play your game???
And how is it, that you seem incapable of answering my challenge? Is it because the answer is a pill too bitter to swallow???
Hmmmmmm?
Still waiting...
232
posted on
01/27/2004 1:47:08 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Capitalist Eric
We can pick this up later. I am sure after you give this some thought you will see how ridiculous your charge of treason really is.
To: TomasUSMC
We are finished demanding, we are now acting, we will not vote for George Bush for President until he rescinds the Amnesty Plan. Period Do you think you are the Queen of England or something with your use of the royal "we".
BTW, would you rather have a demo who would actually put through amnesty.
I surmise you do with your above rant, but I am not surprised since, IMO, a person like you who depends on pure emotion rather than thinking is prone to using rants.
234
posted on
01/27/2004 1:50:09 AM PST
by
Dane
To: TomasUSMC
You might be a jar-head, but your words are
on the money.I agree completely.
Be well...
235
posted on
01/27/2004 1:50:12 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Capitalist Eric
It isn't me making the asinine argument that an immigration proposal should be punishable by death. You are in a round room looking for a corner and are now reduced to semantic games. As I said, you let your emotions overcome common sense but that is fairly typical for you.
To: TomasUSMC; Texasforever; Dane
BTW, Tomas-
texasforever and dane are two dyed-in-the-wool kool-aide-drinking sheeple.
Dane is long on the hot air, and short on the fact. Take a look at my "adjustment" of him at post #222, if you have any doubts.
Texas...? well, he's about the same as dane. though, instead of exclusively trying to put words into your mouth, texas tries the rope-a-dope strategy, pulling you into a BS discussion that has no bearing on... anything. texas is quite consistent about this, from what I've seen of his posts over the last few weeks... and he tends to get angry when you point out his inconsistencies and lies.
They're just a couple more lemmings...
Be well.
237
posted on
01/27/2004 1:57:11 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: motzman
Some people say that If Republicans and conservatives don't understand or refuse to admit that the only way to defeat "liberalism" is incrementally, we're doomed.
I disagree. Abortion did not come about incrementally, it came about in one day at the Supreme Court. 3000 innocent babies are murdered every single day in this country. Is that incremental. Should we bide our time while 3000 die every single day?
In one day El Presidente has blessed another 10 million illegal invaders in this country with legitimacy. In one day. Is that Incremental. Should we take our time about trying to reverse his course on that.
When you are sick do you ever go to the doctor and ask him to get you better slowly. Incrementalism is the slow spreading plague of Islam infesting this country, and it is being helped by our Presidente calling it a religion of Peace. Should we take our time to correct this.
Some out there may be fooled into the incrementalist mindset, as for me and mine we will stand our ground and fight.
238
posted on
01/27/2004 1:57:54 AM PST
by
TomasUSMC
(from tomasUSMC FIGHT FOR THE LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE)
To: Texasforever
It isn't me making the asinine argument that an immigration proposal should be punishable by death.
LINK TO MY POST SAYING THIS? OR ARE YOU JUST LYING AGAIN????
239
posted on
01/27/2004 1:58:52 AM PST
by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally deranged, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Texasforever
Make the electorate conservative and the government will become conservative. The mob and the demagogue will triumph in the end. But Reagan held them back for a while.
240
posted on
01/27/2004 2:00:18 AM PST
by
Allan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 661 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson