To: ashrak
I would say that they must show the earliest a baby HAS survived and make that the cut off. If a baby is shown to survive earlier than the law states then it could easily be changed to reflect that. Then at this point, anyone who has previously aborted a baby after the date of the NEW cutoff should be charged with murder of a potentially sentient human being.
Would you agree to that stipulation? I doubt it.
41 posted on
02/08/2004 7:46:59 PM PST by
trussell
(Troll Hunter Extraordinaire)
To: trussell
So by this post you think that a law can be passed and effedct people from the time before it was passed?
CMON MAN........your reaching.stretching.
No law in any area can be made to effect people before the law was made. That makes no sense.How can a person choose to do an illegal action when it is not illegal when they do it? You just absolutely love to remove choice dont you?
You are bordering on anti american values my friend...do you really not support peoples individual right to choose their own way thru life? and to make their own decisions about their own life? Do you honestly thik that you can dictate to all people what they can and cannot do in every aspect of their life?????
Go live iran man.Or maybe northewest pakistan...you would fit right in.
44 posted on
02/09/2004 12:14:15 PM PST by
ashrak
(do you know my name?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson