Replies

The full text of the Declaration is right there in the U.S. Code.

Kindly show Title and Section.

It's in the US Code.

Kindly show Title and Section.

Why?

You haven't actually demonstrated that it's in the code as organic law, as you claim.

Why is it there?

You haven't actually demonstrated that it's in the code as organic law, as you claim.

Could it be that it is important to our laws in some way?

If it is actually there, as organic law, according to your claim, your argument might have merit. You have not demonstrated this.

"If A, then B" only applies if you've actually demonstrated A.

Duh. You tell me. You stand refuted.

Actually, I don't. You stand unproven.

I don't think I need to go any further.

I provided the exact location in a url.

U.S. Code citations are not URL-based. Try again.

Want me to cut and paste the text of the Declaration right from the website and post it here?

No. I want you to provide the exact United States Code citation that, as you claim, makes the Declaration of Independence organic law.

After that, you might be able to argue that your claims about the significance of the Declaration of Independence actually have some basis.

How the Supreme Court Has Invoked the Declaration

For nearly two centuries the Supreme Court has invoked the Declaration of Independence. Much of that time, it has used the Declaration to define the meaning of racial equality.

When the slave ship Amistad ran aground near New York in 1837, antislavery activists seized the opportunity and tried to incorporate their understanding that "all men" included slaves who should be free unless they lived in slave states. The Court rejected the federal government's argument that the slaves should be returned to their owners, by asking rhetorical questions such as this:

Did the people of the United States, whose government is based on the great principles of the revolution, proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, confer upon the federal, executive or judicial tribunals, the power of making our nation accessories to such atrocious violations of human rights?

As the conflict over slavery grew in the 1840s and 1850s, Chief Justice Taney decided to de-rail the antislavery forces by declaring that the founders had never included slaves as anything but property. They were never part of "the people" he asserted in the Dred Scott Case.

When the Declaration was written, Taney argued, all European nations had conceived Africans as "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race either in social or political relations." This opinion was, of course, so divisive, and offensive to many Americans, that Lincoln and other Republicans received an enormous boost in their campaigns to end slavery.

Jefferson's words have appeared frequently in more recent judgments of the Supreme Court. When the Little Rock School Board integrated Central High School in 1957, white opponents of desegregation asked the Supreme Court to declare their riot legitimate protest.

The Court rejected the argument, implying that the Declaration of Independence had ushered in a government of laws that had no place for unlawful rebellions. The Court commended the board for trying to comply with its order to desegregate with "all deliberate speed."

In recent years Justice Stevens has used the principles of "equality" and "liberty" in the Declaration to argue, in Fullilove v. Klutznick, that cities cannot constitutionally create set-aside programs for minority-owned businesses because the government would be reverting to the kind of business patronage that the Revolution ended.

He also cited the Declaration in arguing that the state should not stop the family of a woman in a coma from turning off life support because, in Nancy Cruzan's case, life and liberty were not synonymous. Jefferson's words still sway the high court.

See post 710. Declaration is law by the authority of SCOTUS.

"Kindly show Title and Section."

Just my two cents for what it's worth. Went to the site concerned and from what I could gather, the DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE does not have a "title" and "section", per se. But the document is important enough, unarguably, that it is not required. To say that it is not a part of the USC, would be to relegate it to irrelevance.