To: Texas_Dawg
A few people don't make the artificially propped-up wages that they used to, due to free competition. Everyone else makes more money though due to their real income being increased. It's not often, that I chat with someone who is so clueless, that they have no idea of how clueless they really are...
But you seem to be of those people. Simply put, you aren't sufficiently educated to intelligently discuss- much less debate- this subject. As has been demonstrated by your responses to a variety of posters, not just myself...
Your posts are rife with errors, and short on logic. Maybe you should return to the University, and take a course beyond Econ-1A... You might learn something.
551 posted on
01/13/2004 12:20:17 PM PST by
Capitalist Eric
(To be a liberal, one must be mentally incompetant, or ignorant of reality.)
To: Capitalist Eric
That's nice. A lot of economists, such as Milton Friedman and George Bush's economic advisors completely disagree with you that instantly removing 10 million workers from the labor force would be a good thing. You have a bunch of bizarre hysteria about things that simply are not happening, and that's why your side is losing this argument so heavily. Most people simply don't care about people immigrating from Mexico to work.
563 posted on
01/13/2004 12:27:36 PM PST by
Texas_Dawg
(Most of the FReepers opposed to illegal immigration are opposed to immigration/immigrants entirely.)
To: Capitalist Eric
When does adding potential workers to the nation's workforce become a detriment to this country's economy? To think, all this time, I've been hearing the argument that global American businesses that are outsourcing jobs to India and China was a detriment to our nation's economy. Give illegals citizenship once they get a job, that's potential taxes collected.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson