Skip to comments.
Savage: Impeach Bush over immigration plan
WND ^
| 1-12-04
| N/A
Posted on 01/13/2004 5:54:13 AM PST by JustPiper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 ... 1,361-1,362 next last
To: JustPiper
701
posted on
01/13/2004 2:18:52 PM PST
by
The_Eaglet
(Conservative chat on IRC: http://searchirc.com/search.php?F=exact&T=chan&N=33&I=conservative)
To: Semaphore Heathcliffe
do a google on "Operation Wetback." My understanding is it was an Eisenhower administration deportation. Wow! Thanks for posting this.
To: kevao
Thats the fact Jack!
703
posted on
01/13/2004 2:19:45 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: JustPiper
Pls. add me to your list...it's time to take on both parites which are full of leeches, parasites, fags, NWO-ites, marxists and a few gray haired old ladies who don't know any better. They're all begging for a good butt kickin'
704
posted on
01/13/2004 2:21:05 PM PST
by
american spirit
(ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION = NATIONAL SUICIDE)
To: greenwolf; Sabertooth; All
705
posted on
01/13/2004 2:22:37 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: kevao; Alamo-Girl
Wait a minute. I had to backtrack here realising nu-uh. Bubba was alot more than just an intern. You need to read Alamo Girl's Study in everything crooked about Clinton
706
posted on
01/13/2004 2:24:13 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: JamesA
Congress will stop it, wonder if Bush will veto? But we are not liberals, we will not forget what he wants to do.
707
posted on
01/13/2004 2:25:47 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: Happy2BMe
"Seek and ye shall find."
Why so coy ? Why not just answer the woman's question ? Its unfortunate you can find sufficient wherewithal to criticize President Bush for his courage in addressing this emotional issue but come up noticably short when it comes to stating your intention.
708
posted on
01/13/2004 2:27:17 PM PST
by
Darlin'
("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
To: JustPiper
..."Tonight Savage called Bush a liberal ".. well I disagree..Bush is a dyed in the wool NEOCON.
709
posted on
01/13/2004 2:28:51 PM PST
by
Zipporah
(Write inTancredo in 2004)
To: exmarine; Modernman; m1-lightning; Poohbah
How the Supreme Court Has Invoked the Declaration
For nearly two centuries the Supreme Court has invoked the Declaration of Independence. Much of that time, it has used the Declaration to define the meaning of racial equality.
When the slave ship Amistad ran aground near New York in 1837, antislavery activists seized the opportunity and tried to incorporate their understanding that "all men" included slaves who should be free unless they lived in slave states. The Court rejected the federal government's argument that the slaves should be returned to their owners, by asking rhetorical questions such as this:
Did the people of the United States, whose government is based on the great principles of the revolution, proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, confer upon the federal, executive or judicial tribunals, the power of making our nation accessories to such atrocious violations of human rights?
As the conflict over slavery grew in the 1840s and 1850s, Chief Justice Taney decided to de-rail the antislavery forces by declaring that the founders had never included slaves as anything but property. They were never part of "the people" he asserted in the Dred Scott Case.
When the Declaration was written, Taney argued, all European nations had conceived Africans as "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race either in social or political relations." This opinion was, of course, so divisive, and offensive to many Americans, that Lincoln and other Republicans received an enormous boost in their campaigns to end slavery.
Jefferson's words have appeared frequently in more recent judgments of the Supreme Court. When the Little Rock School Board integrated Central High School in 1957, white opponents of desegregation asked the Supreme Court to declare their riot legitimate protest.
The Court rejected the argument, implying that the Declaration of Independence had ushered in a government of laws that had no place for unlawful rebellions. The Court commended the board for trying to comply with its order to desegregate with "all deliberate speed."
In recent years Justice Stevens has used the principles of "equality" and "liberty" in the Declaration to argue, in Fullilove v. Klutznick, that cities cannot constitutionally create set-aside programs for minority-owned businesses because the government would be reverting to the kind of business patronage that the Revolution ended.
He also cited the Declaration in arguing that the state should not stop the family of a woman in a coma from turning off life support because, in Nancy Cruzan's case, life and liberty were not synonymous. Jefferson's words still sway the high court.
To: hedgetrimmer
Attributed to IAN MYLCHREEST
To: B4Ranch
Hey I agree.. but if the US took border security seriously, which they do not, and then prosecuted employers and cut off social services to illegals (ENFORCE THE LAW) the illegals would repatriate themselves.
712
posted on
01/13/2004 2:31:40 PM PST
by
Zipporah
(Write inTancredo in 2004)
To: Yardstick
I do that too with many attacks here ;)
713
posted on
01/13/2004 2:31:57 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: T.Smith
"Voting is not betting. I am not trying to pick the guy I think will win. I will be telling the government that a particular candidate is the one who best represents how I want the government run. If my guy does not win, so be it. If the Democrat wins, then that's just how the electorate crumbles, so to speak. But, the country will come to ruin no matter whether led by a Democrat or a Republican. When that happens, at least I will be able to say "I voted my conscience"
Good Grief. If you truly believe that, if all you see is despair, then why put yourself through an election ? Don't even try to hold on to vote your conscience in November if only hopelessness reigns. Why not just step out in front of a mack truck today ? .... oh, wait.... then you wouldn't be able to hang out here whining santimoniously about your moral superiority, voting your conscience, etc. What a loss that would be.
714
posted on
01/13/2004 2:34:14 PM PST
by
Darlin'
("I will not forget this wound to my country." President George W Bush, 20 Sept 2001)
To: DB
"So is he going to impeach the congress too?".. not a bad idea.. but the President is the head of the party.. and he sets policy. A Republican congress will follow his lead. They all are traitors.. the whole lot of them.. with of course a few exceptions..
WRITE IN TANCREDO IN 2004
715
posted on
01/13/2004 2:34:35 PM PST
by
Zipporah
(Write inTancredo in 2004)
To: hedgetrimmer
Doesn't feed the bulldog. Which part of the US Code makes the Declaration of Independence "organic law?"
716
posted on
01/13/2004 2:35:43 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
"Well, Clinton's sale of hi-tech weaponry to China, who also plans to destroy us, is the worst".. Actually, Bush's immigration proposal is worse.. it IS absolutely the end of our nation. Giving a pass to revolutionaries and paying them to be here is much worse. At least with China we'd be able to protect ourselves. I'm not giving Clinton a pass for SURE.. the man was a blight. But I have lost all respect for Bush.
717
posted on
01/13/2004 2:37:56 PM PST
by
Zipporah
(Write inTancredo in 2004)
To: Vision
718
posted on
01/13/2004 2:39:44 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Register Independent and Write-In Tancredo for March !!!!)
To: m1-lightning; JustPiper
Didn't Ron Paul vote against taking out Saddam Hussein? Yep, Paul co-sponsored a bill with a liberal from Oregon.
719
posted on
01/13/2004 2:41:16 PM PST
by
Dane
To: hedgetrimmer
Thank you - I did not think about court cases, but these are definitely LAW.
720
posted on
01/13/2004 2:43:11 PM PST
by
exmarine
( sic semper tyrannis)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700, 701-720, 721-740 ... 1,361-1,362 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson