[CSM]

It stems from this statement that you made:

"A problem arises and some elected representative rises to the occasion to propose a solution."

So which is it? Do elected reps rise to the occasion to propose solutions to problems by passing laws, or are laws passed by these reps for other reasons? Which side are you going to take?

You asked: "So, can you cite for us some examples where this is substantially *not* the case?"

Yes, how about lowering DUI levels of BAC to 0.08. The problem of DUI is clearly at 0.15 or higher. Once it gets to 0.10 or lower the deaths involving alcohol occur at the same rate as the deaths not involving alcohol. Another example would be the zero tolerance laws in the schools, solutions to imagined problems.

Then again, according to your statement an "imagined" problem is as substantial a cause for a law as a real "problem".

Of course, I have the opinion that most laws passed and enforced are not in the best interest of society, rather they are about revenue generation.

[robertpaulsen]

"Of course, I have the opinion that most laws passed and enforced are not in the best interest of society, rather they are about revenue generation."

My opinion is that most laws are passed because the people look to the government to "do something" about a problem. Passing additional laws is their solution.