Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stop Pointing Guns at Our Kids
marijuana.com ^ | 12.8.03 | Marsha Rosenbaum

Posted on 12/11/2003 3:36:22 PM PST by freepatriot32

As the mother of a teenager, I share the outrage experienced by parents of Stratford High School students, who were recently terrorized by Goose Creek, South Carolina police. In an effort to purge the school of drugs, law enforcement was called in by the administration. After rounding up the students, pointing guns at them, and searching their lockers, no drugs were found. The students, however, were scared to death.

The use of weapons on the Stratford High School campus is testament to the failure of our efforts to stop young people from using drugs, and the frustration experienced by school officials.

No parent wants their teenager to use drugs. We should understand, however, that teenage experimentation is not surprising in a country that aggressively advertises alcohol and anti-depressants on prime time TV, rendering these and other kinds of drugs a part of American culture. Teens who experiment with alcohol and other drugs are not necessarily bad kids, nor are their parents necessarily failing to do their job. It's just that in reality, America is not drug free, and neither are our teenagers.

Although the incident in Goose Creek was isolated, it was no more successful than any other attempt to keep young people from experimenting with drugs in the last 20 years. As parents, it's one thing to read about our country's War on Drugs. It really hits home, however, when our own children are subjected to the violence that has characterized this failed policy.

We tried "just say no," which entered our vernacular in 1980 when marijuana use had already peaked and was on the decline. Still, with Reagan's new "tough on crime" posture and the First Lady's pet project, anti-drug funding (and sentiment) increased sharply.

The Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program reached children in 80 percent of school districts across the country.

The private sector got involved in the crusade, with the Partnership for a Drug-Free America filling the airwaves with images and warnings. Who could forget the egg-in-the-frying-pan "this is your brain" commercials?

By the early 1990s, an American teenager had to be living under a rock to have missed anti-drug messages.

But then a strange shift began to occur. Despite universal school-based prevention programs, anti-drug ads, intolerance of illegal drugs, and a "lock 'em up" attitude, national surveys indicated that teenage use of alcohol and other drugs was increasing.

Teens, it seemed, were becoming bored, rather than frightened, by fear-based messages about drugs, and bone-tired of admonishments to abstain. Obviously the message wasn't effective, with half of all teens experimenting with illegal drugs, and 80 percent trying alcohol before graduating from high school.

As a response to increased alcohol and other drug use among teenagers, and to let them know we meant business, "zero tolerance" policies were implemented in secondary schools across the country. Students were regularly suspended, or even expelled for possession or use of a range of substances, including Tylenol and Midol. Drug-sniffing dogs were unleashed on campuses in an effort to locate drugs, and to further "send a message."

The tentacles of the growing urine testing industry reached teenagers when the testing of athletes became de rigeur in the mid-1990s. Recently the Supreme Court ruled that student drug testing is legal for all extracurricular activities, and the Office of National Drug Control Policy is pushing the testing of all secondary school students (to the delight of the drug testing industry, and with no evidence that it actually works to deter drug use). For many American teenagers, the Fourth Amendment of our Bill of Rights has become an historical artifact. Not to mention that in America we are all supposed to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around.

But there is another way. While government agencies continue to devise increasingly harsh policies to no avail, real parents in the real world living with real teenagers, myself among them, are looking at pragmatic alternatives to zero tolerance.

Today's parents, like those in Goose Creek, are skeptical of policies that demonize and frighten their teenagers without ensuring their health, well-being, and safety. If total abstinence isn't a realistic alternative, we want our teens to be educated about drugs by giving them scientific, honest information, not exaggerated claims designed (unsuccessfully) to scare them. We want school policies that protect students without jeopardizing the future of those who make immature mistakes. We want counseling and support, rather than humiliation, suspension, expulsion, or, as in the case of Stratford High, violence.

Our children's safety should be top priority when it comes to educating them about drugs. Pointing guns at their heads is not the answer.

Marsha Rosenbaum, PhD, directs the Safety First drug education project at the Drug Policy Alliance in San Francisco.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: nokingbutpot; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2003 3:36:24 PM PST by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmc813
ping
2 posted on 12/11/2003 3:37:05 PM PST by freepatriot32 (today it was the victory act tomorrow its victory coffee, victory cigarettes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Wod_list
With the outstanding gun-handling skills of some LEO's, how long before an accidental discharge kills an innocent kid?

If that happens, will the death go in the "death due to drugs" column of the War on Drugs scorecard?
3 posted on 12/11/2003 3:42:52 PM PST by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
Marsha Rosenbaum, PhD, directs the Safety First drug education project at the Drug Policy Alliance in San Francisco.

Dr. Rosenbaum's son


4 posted on 12/11/2003 3:45:17 PM PST by ThreeYearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
"The tentacles of the growing urine testing industry reached teenagers when the testing of athletes became de rigeur in the mid-1990s. Recently the Supreme Court ruled that student drug testing is legal for all extracurricular activities, and the Office of National Drug Control Policy is pushing the testing of all secondary school students (to the delight of the drug testing industry, and with no evidence that it actually works to deter drug use)."

Let them push this and it will be the end of public education in this country, at least on the secondary level. People are getting sick of this.
5 posted on 12/11/2003 3:52:06 PM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
It's just that in reality, America is not drug free, and neither are our teenagers.
6 posted on 12/11/2003 3:54:54 PM PST by Imal (Truth is a balm to the righteous, and a poison to the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreeYearLurker
Liberals typically attack the messenger, when they can't refute the message.

If some F####### cop had pointed a gun at my son under these circumstances, the results would have been somewhat more dramatic.

Which is a greater danger to my kids - drugs, or the WOD?

It seems the answer is the WOD.

7 posted on 12/11/2003 3:55:17 PM PST by patton (I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Thinking maybe the kids should have been armed.

And no, I ain't kidding.

8 posted on 12/11/2003 3:56:01 PM PST by Eris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
That whole "raid", in the way it was done, was totally unnecessary. That had to scare the h*ll out of those kids.
9 posted on 12/11/2003 4:00:29 PM PST by SCDogPapa (In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32
I know the article is serious, but I couldn't help but laugh at this online poll: What are you giving people this Holiday Season?

Some killer buds. 30%32 %32 % 32.97 % (91)
Glass pipes, bubblers, or a bong. 10 %10 %10 % 10.51 % (29)
Dugouts or other smoking accessories 1 %1 %1 % 1.81 % (5)
Something with a marijuana leaf on it. 6 %6 %6 % 6.16 % (17)
Hemp-based clothing or personal items 2 %2 %2 % 2.54 % (7)
Literature, not otherwise specified 4 %4 %4 % 4.35 % (12)
Music, not otherwise specified 6 %6 %6 % 6.88 % (19)
The economy cancelled Xmas this year, sorry. 34 %34 %34 % 34.78 % (96)

Total Votes: 276
We allow just one vote per day

Stoners.

10 posted on 12/11/2003 4:03:23 PM PST by spodefly (This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
Dude! where'd ya find the poll?
11 posted on 12/11/2003 4:07:08 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SCDogPapa
Scared straight, or scared away?
12 posted on 12/11/2003 4:10:57 PM PST by Imal (Truth is a balm to the righteous, and a poison to the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SCDogPapa
The superintendent of Goose Creek public schools was interviewed on CNN today and he was shown viewing a newly released tape of the raid. He was appalled -- as well he should be because after these fancy lawyers, as well as the ACLU who are filing their own separate suit, get finished with this school, he'll be driving a taxi for a living.
13 posted on 12/11/2003 4:11:17 PM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
It will be called a tragedy and collateral damage,after all the LEO involved will be following long established policy and cannot be held liable legally or civilly because he/she will have statutory immunity....So will the next LEO and the next and the next and .......Get it.This is not about drugs as much as it is about Governmental power,and believe it or not children will be murdered by bad LEO's and nothing will be done to them or those in charge....It is simple,we are slowly being indoctrinated to believe that such behavior by those in law enforcement is necessary to protect us from harm and the death of a few innocents is necessary for the greater good of society....OK, I sound like a nut,well think about how things were handled at Ruby Ridge and Waco versus death free resolution with the Montana Freeman (Really bad people)....The politicians realized that we VOTERS would not stand for another slaughter and kept a much tighter reign on their assault troops....Time has passed and they start anew,we have to be vigilant or we will see more needless suffering and death....You Good LEO's have to come forth and protect us from the very few bad among you,please help the citizens of this country before you are considered part of this travesty.
14 posted on 12/11/2003 4:14:23 PM PST by Papabear47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
15 posted on 12/11/2003 4:14:50 PM PST by jmc813 (Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
It was the "WOD" that allowed the JBT's at Waco to waive the Possie Comitatus act and use the military to help assault the compound. Koresh had dismantled meth making equipment and had it stored as junk.
16 posted on 12/11/2003 4:23:45 PM PST by FNG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FNG
It was the "WOD" that allowed the JBT's at Waco to waive the Possie Comitatus act and use the military to help assault the compound.

Good point. People seem to keep forgetting that.

17 posted on 12/11/2003 5:19:53 PM PST by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
He was appalled as well he should be

You are right. There was no excuse for the cops pulling their guns, unless they had prior knowledge that someone could be armed.

I'm sure the school and the cops are going to be sued.

18 posted on 12/11/2003 5:21:34 PM PST by SCDogPapa (In Dixie Land I'll take my stand to live and die in Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SCDogPapa
Oh, they most definitely are going to be sued. Lawsuits have already been filed.
19 posted on 12/11/2003 5:22:25 PM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
My son plays high school football. I do not want him being tackled and injured by another student under the influence of drugs.

But, you probably couldn't care less about my son, right? Testing students involved in extracurricular activities like football infringes on their rights, huh? The end of secondary education, huh?

Well, as a parent let me say, "F### you and the horse you rode in on." You are deserving of your moniker.

20 posted on 12/12/2003 5:03:23 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson