[Lexinom]

"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" Romans 1:22.

Would that ignorance include accepting as fact that which has never been proven, or observed, or measured? How is this any less closeminded than believing the Genesis account? Don't just resort to insult and mockery (as your type seem wont to do), I would like to see a sensible answer.

[f.Christian]

To: f.Christian

Dakmar...

I took a few minutes to decipher that post, and I must say I agree with a lot of what you said.

fC...

These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH(limited NON-intrusive PC Govt/religion---schools)!

Dakmar...

Where you and I diverge is on the Evolution/Communism thing. You seem to view Darwin and evolution as the beginning of the end for enlighted, moral civilization, while I think Marx, class struggle, and the "dictatorship of the proletariat" are the true dangers.

God bless you, I think we both have a common enemy in the BRAVE-NWO.

452 posted on 9/7/02 8:54 PM Pacific by Dakmar

[Ogmios]

The answers are all over the net, if you expect me to give you Biology 101 on a news forum, you are sadly mistaken.

I will tell you that you are ignorant of anything regarding evolution, because every one of your points is a strawman that has been refuted ad nauseum on this board.

I tire of such nonsensical silliness, and talking until I am blue in the face the difference between science and theology.