Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: dead
That's my point. He was not found guilty of murder in court.

You can say, "in my opinion, he is a murderer". But you cannot say "he IS a murderer", and expect it to hold up in an anti-defamation lawsuit.

I don't think OJ is going to sue you. But, I would worry about Felos and Schiavo.
89 posted on 10/24/2003 11:05:53 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Pan_Yans Wife
Felos and schiavo have a lot of threads to go through...
91 posted on 10/24/2003 11:06:47 AM PDT by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
You can say, "in my opinion, he is a murderer". But you cannot say "he IS a murderer", and expect it to hold up in an anti-defamation lawsuit.

The determination in the civil trial he lost would serve as conclusive evidence that OJ was, in fact, a murderer. OJ lost that case, so anyone suing him, or being sued by him, could use that case as a determinating fact to show that OJ murdered those two.

115 posted on 10/24/2003 11:15:42 AM PDT by Modernman ("I'm just a simple man, trying to make my way in the universe."- Jango Fett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson