To: lugsoul
Get it straight. The legal guardian wanted it done. The judge didn't decide that it should be done. He decided that someone else couldn't stop it. Are you a moral relativist? i.e. do you believe morals come from man? Yes or no.
To: exmarine
You said the judge ordered the feeding tube removed. That is wrong. If the Schiavos don't intervene, the judge is never involved. The judge said the Schiavos couldn't stop it - he didn't order that it be done. If you don't understand the difference, think about this question: If Michael changed his mind and decided not to pull the tube, would he be in contempt of court?
You can't even keep black and white straight in your own black and white mind.
766 posted on
10/24/2003 2:58:09 PM PDT by
lugsoul
(And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside)
To: Jim Robinson
Jim? Jim? Hey bud, double shot straight up. Appreciate it.
Come on dude, it's friday. Damned. Someone kick the f#$%^#(@# jukebox.
Hmm, Any requests? Let's see, how bout a little of
Toby Keith's Beer for my Horses.
Yeah that's the ticket.
PEANUTS !!!!!!!!!!!
775 posted on
10/24/2003 3:00:58 PM PDT by
Area51
(RINO hunter!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson