Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Modernman
I guess I'll have to read up more on this, but it just seems so unjust to me. If I'm doing everything within the borders of my own state, I'd think I'd have the right to not be blindsided by the laws of another state, the drafting of which I had absolutely no say in. Either that, or there should be some controlling federal law. At least I'd have a say in that.
255 posted on 10/24/2003 12:01:39 PM PDT by inquest ("Where else do gun owners have to go?" - Lee Atwater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
If I'm doing everything within the borders of my own state, I'd think I'd have the right to not be blindsided by the laws of another state,

In such a case, where all the events in question occurred in your home state and the guy suing you was from another state, you'd get the benefit of your home state's substantive law.

Now, in the case of the rock thrown into Virginia from Maryland, your actions did harm in a different state, so you're not really doing eveything in the borders of your own state- the damage arose in Virginia.

305 posted on 10/24/2003 12:18:05 PM PDT by Modernman ("I'm just a simple man, trying to make my way in the universe."- Jango Fett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson