To: tpaine
Usually without even a reason.. To some... moderator = power over others.
I suspect if you reviewed the history of which moderators ban most, and pull posts most... you'd find which ones crave that power most.
Just a guess.
1,062 posted on
10/20/2003 7:29:43 AM PDT by
OWK
To: OWK; Jim Robinson; tpaine; Dales
I always thought Jim has the final say in who gets banned.
Am I wrong?
Or are people saying that the moderators are strong arming Jim into banning people who shouldn't be banned because they have a fixation with power?
I think there are a handful of folks, current and past, who have a fixation with banning.
1,066 posted on
10/20/2003 7:40:09 AM PDT by
Neets
(Frogs have it easy..they can eat whatever's bugging them.)
To: OWK
OWK wrote:
To some... moderator = power over others.
I suspect if you reviewed the history of which moderators ban most, and pull posts most... you'd find which ones crave that power most.
Exactly.
And if we ~all~ had the ability to see that it was Mod#86 doing the largest percentage of the pulling. -- It becomes evident why secrecy is necessary..
1,068 posted on
10/20/2003 7:44:02 AM PDT by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but Arnie won, & politics as usual lost. Yo!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson