Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse
The Rockafellers, Bush's, and Kenndy's might be able to afford all the necessary equipement to make, and store, their own atomic weapons. The things are hideously expensive to maintain.

Actually, they aren't; even at peak numbers of deployed and stored weapons, the total budget for nuclear weapons (including R&D, acquisition, and O&M costs) never exceeded 1% of the DoD budget, and we had something like 30,000 weapons in the stockpile--and that was at grossly overpriced government rates.

And many of the folks interested in nuclear weapons would not be interested in holding onto said weapons long enough for maintenance to be an issue.

302 posted on 10/31/2003 9:52:35 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
And the billions we are currently dumping into storage, maintanance, and research is what? Chicken feed? Can you afford it? I'm willing to bet even Gates would have trouble being able to keep his own arsenal.
304 posted on 10/31/2003 9:56:21 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson