[from occupied ga]

If we defend every nutcase, just because he happens to also be a gun-owner, it doesn't help our case, it just makes us look like nuts.

I was waiting for someone to take this position. There's always at least one. You totally missed my point. This guy may or may not be a nut case, but the newspaper articles were hit pieces designed to demonize the guy. Observe the use of the words "compound" and "anti-aircraft gun." Observe the quotes from unnamed sources. Nothing about getting a statement from the guy himself. Oh no. You can rest assured that his side will NEVER get heard. Particularly if he isn't a "nut case", as you are apparently all too ready o believe from reading the agenda driven mainstream press.

This BS is blatently obvious propaganda fabricated either in whole or in part by jackboot licking marxist lackeys in the press. And once the make their agenda so obvious, what else have they distorted or completely. My guess is almost everything. SO who knows the truth? The government - maybe. But do you actually think that after Waco you can trust them. Not me brother.

[samtheman]

The whacko's at Waco were murdered by the Clinton Nazis, that's for sure. But they were still whackos.

I'm not saying it was ok to murder them. And I'm not saying that it's ok that their murderers went unpunished.

All I'm saying that there are whackos out there and I'm not going to spend my time hyperventilating over their right to selectively break laws.

Gun-owning whackos do exist. They are a tiny minority of the total population of gun owners. But they do exist. If we aren't allowed to call a whacko a whacko when we see one, then we are just as guilty of censorship as those on the hitlery goonsquad left.