Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Pin Down Sea Squirt Genetics
AP Science ^ | 2002-12-12 | PAUL RECER

Posted on 12/17/2002 3:45:31 AM PST by Junior

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: sciencediet
the juvenile sea squirt is an aquatic mammal

He had better check his sources.

21 posted on 12/18/2002 7:34:41 PM PST by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
That wasn't what I asked. You are constantly going on about how all genetics disproves evolution. Here we have an actual biologist (you know, someone who actually works in the field of biology) saying exactly the opposite. Nice attempt to change the subject, though.
22 posted on 12/19/2002 2:11:43 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Junior
That wasn't what I asked.

If you evolutionists had a brain you would realize that this squirt has no ancestors and no descendants. That disproves evolution.

23 posted on 12/19/2002 5:53:14 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
Ah, so you admit you can't confront the issue. Not all genetics disproves evolution, does it?
24 posted on 12/19/2002 7:10:31 AM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Ah, so you admit you can't confront the issue. Not all genetics disproves evolution, does it?

Unlike what you and your fellow evolutionists think, this discussion is about facts, not about the messengers of the facts.The article here as has been shown disproves evolution. What that means is that God is not dead, that materialistic evolution is bunk.

As usual you try to attack me by misrepresenting what I have said on other threads. You had an opportunity to discuss it there but of course since people would have seen the context there and my statements were correct you did not do so then. Let's see you give the full response I gave and a link to the thread where it was said. You will not of course because you will be proving that you have misrepresented my statements.

25 posted on 12/19/2002 4:53:42 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
Unlike what you and your fellow evolutionists think, this discussion is about facts...

And the fact is, not all discoveries in genetics falsify evolution, which is what you always claim. Now, you've been caught out, and I'd like to hear you admit you were wrong. Of course, that'll never happen, as you'll forget this exchange ever took place, as you've forgotten every exchange where you had your tail-end handed to you on a silver platter. Have you figured out that chimps don't have tails yet? Of course, you've forgotten making that remark as it occured two days ago. Just like you forgot about claiming circles were not ellipses, or that the planets had wildly-elliptical orbits, or that 1720 is a really big number. Your credibility on anything is completely shot, but you don't remember this as your memory resets to zero on each new thread.

26 posted on 12/19/2002 5:15:14 PM PST by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
Thanks for the heads up! I'm on Christmas vacation, and my "inbox" overfloweth ... so it's taking a long time to respond. Sigh...
27 posted on 12/21/2002 11:39:02 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson