Skip to comments.
Mudd Letters Opened To Public: Van Dam Jurors Continue to Mull and Ponder Westerfield's Fate! 8-15
Union Trib ^
| August 15, 2002
| Union Trib
Posted on 08/14/2002 9:29:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 921-930 next last
To: NatureGirl
David Westerfield was in the presence of the police for the original 9.5 hour visit at the substation. After he came home after midnight, he was not allowed back into his home. He sat in his SUV, and two detectives got in to it with him. I believe it was Keyser and Ott. (could be wrong). After that they took him to a hotel and stayed with him. The next day they began their merry jaunt to recreate his travels. I could see he'd be more than a little testy.
I wonder that since LE was in the SUV with him, were tape lifts taken of these boys to determine if they left trace in the vehicle?
401
posted on
08/15/2002 1:36:50 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: BullDog108
You also see Tuesday. Is this the supposed drop-off receipt?
To: BullDog108
Wow....
To: All
Yikes, I am watching the victim impact statements at the sentencing hearing for the CA High School Shooting in Santana.
Here we have a clear case that this kid is the killer.
If Westerfield is convicted I really don't think I will be able to watch the impact statements.
To: spectre; the Deejay
Here is a link to their website and the audio file. I originally found it on the SD UT website when it happended. Can't get to it now without paying.
Ken + John @$$Hole show archives. File dated 02/15.
Here is what I get when I click on that file. If anyone can do something with this, it would be very appreciated.
AND YES, Spectre, that is what they did.
Had to remove the GT and LT signs to get it to show.
ASX VERSION="3.0" ENTRY REF HREF = "http://www.johnandkenshow.com/audio/files/danielle.wma" / /ENTRY /ASX
To: ican'tbelieveit
Date looks like 2/4/02 and maybe 12 something for the time.
To: the Deejay
It sure seems that way. I wonder if the jury in the OJ trial was sequestered???? Just curiosity
To: small_l_libertarian; cyncooper
Yoo Hoo, Cyn. Hadn't I been sayin' it? Didn't I tell ya?
Thanks for the present.
408
posted on
08/15/2002 1:40:21 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: domestice
Why would they need to be sequestered..they deliberated for what 2 hours???
Actually I believe they were but in reality it really didnt matter.
To: JudyB1938
HOW MANY OF THOSE FOSTER PARENTS BELONG TO SWINGER &/OR PORNO CLUBS? In SD ? Want it in numbers or percentage?
To: NatureGirl
Feb 5th warrant 27802 to search Westerfield's computer, computer files and disks for images of nudity and/or sexual activities involving juveniles and/or with adults.
The portion sealed on this warrant is Attachment "1"...last full paragrph on page 3 starting w/Van Dam stated and ending w/Westerfield.
Attachment "1" first full pargph on page 5 starting with "On 2/4/02" and ending w/evaluation
Says search but not copy so it must be the same thing, eh?
This has nothing to do with your question but just happpened to be listing this out and it applied to the warrant.
411
posted on
08/15/2002 1:41:39 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Politicalmom
It'd be the same one. See, black pants, black sweater, black t-shirt. That place is expensive. Hope they do a good job inspite of the front desk girls.
I still like the Black Catsuit theory.
412
posted on
08/15/2002 1:41:51 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Politicalmom
That is the one from the black clothes drop-off. Guess they didn't need Ott's brilliant detective work after all.
To: NatureGirl
What I read on the search warrant said the the disks had an "X" and an "XO" on them, and the police KNEW that meant PORN. Therefore they got a search warrant.
To: theartfuldodger
No idea. I got it from TheSanDiegoChannel.com.
To: Rheo
As I understand it, as of last September, you can begin a search and get the warrant later. I have the info at home. Try to remember to post it later.
416
posted on
08/15/2002 1:44:13 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: small_l_libertarian
great find!
is there a straight-on image available ?
417
posted on
08/15/2002 1:45:06 PM PDT
by
fnord
To: mommya
So - the affidavit uses these discs to support the warrant - but they seemingly were not found till later - after the warrant was executed? Kinda like all the other warrants and the whole case.
"We know he kidnapped her because he killed her; We know he killed her because he kidnapped her. We know both of these because she is dead. Therefore he killed her and kidnapped her, or vice versa. We need no other proof."
To: NatureGirl
A telephonic search warrant doesn't fly. In court, such call would be hearsay.
I realized it was LE that placed those "extra" images of the
child porn onto DW's files. No question about it. At that
particular day/date/time, DW was at the police station.
I don't think LE legaly can make such copies of pc files. I
think LE has to have everything in its original condition.
Good sleuthing, NatureGirl! Bravo!
To: small_l_libertarian
Is this the receipt from the SUV or the receipt from off of the clothes?
The receipt that was on the clothes was testified to as having this info on it.
420
posted on
08/15/2002 1:46:18 PM PDT
by
Rheo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 921-930 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson