Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)

Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

[UCANSEE2]

If DW were raping her, and her head was banging on the headboard, because of the difference in height, his head must have been THROUGH the headboard -- has anyone thought of this???

DUSEK specifically told the jury they are not allowed to think. They are not to consider each individual piece of evidenc on it's own, then add them up.

They are just to vote, as a unit, GUILTY, because everyone knows DW did it.

[Freedom2specul8]

It's getting tense and non-productive.

Will catch up with ya laterzzzzzzzz

[JudyB1938]

Now listen up and pay attention.

Old Dogs CAN learn new tricks. :0)

I didn't think I could understand this computer junk online either, but I kept trying and finally got the hang of most of it.

As far as email though, unless you have some personal friends/family you need to get hold of, you don't need it. I get so much junk that it makes snail mail look like nothing!

[BullDog108]

FWIW, I also agree that pot should be de-criminalized. Not other drugs. But we digress. This thread is about DW. And it amazes me how many FReepers want to hang this guy. I pray that they will never wear his moccosins...

[alisasny]

Here is your original post

I have never heard of him before...but as someone has previously noted, he sounds like a career politician - someone who follows the polls and media to form his conclusions.

You have spinned this to know end....You still deny that someone elses opinion you agreed with.

Now you have resorted to BRAIN FART....keep going...

[KnutCase]

I tend to agree. They would deliberate on the serious charges first, then finish up with the lesser charge of porn. It doesn't make sense to deliberate the lesser charge first. Altho, not being on the jury how would I know? But, with Juror #10 as foreman (the CPA) it seems he would be logical and proceed as above noted.

[JudyB1938]

Boy, you really are upset. I know you know it's SPUN, not SPINNED. (grin)

[spectre]

MY POST WAS A BAIT?!

Coming from little miss innocent, when all reasonable arguments fail "try God", Kim...Queen of the Baiters herself, that is the biggest BAWHAHAHA I've had all day!

Must you always turn something postive into a negative, Kim? I was being most serious. It's obvious that what I posted must be real..look at you, tsk, tsk. Be nice...sw

[BullDog108]

You got that right. I have a small experience with SD Law Enforcement back in 1987. I was wrongfully accused of a theft from a restaurant were I worked. I agreed to take a polygraph, and the polygraph proved I was lying. I told them to arrest me or f*ck off.

They left me alone, and found the perp three months later.

[alisasny]

LOL thanks for bringing me back to reality LOL I just had a great laugh!!

[UCANSEE2]

Here's an idea. In the interest of this thread, other posters, let's drop the argument over BB. He isn't here (unless lurking) and he can defend himself if he wants.

Both of you are very productive contributors to this thread. As someone else said, "how did we get off topic?"

Say, Alisa, did you ever go to that link I had on post 371 ?

[demsux]

I did not MAKE MY ASSUMPTION based on another post, though I did agree with the prior post.

I never said that the PRIOR POST made me think the congressman was clueless with regard to this case...the congressman's OWN STATEMENTS were sufficient for me to form my own opinion.

Are you James Carville?

[JudyB1938]

I am STILL laughing. I thought that was so funny. I could just picture you sitting there with smoke coming out of your ears and your fingers just aflyin', not looking to see what they were punching out. I've done that. LOL

[Henrietta]

You got that right. I have a small experience with SD Law Enforcement back in 1987. I was wrongfully accused of a theft from a restaurant were I worked. I agreed to take a polygraph, and the polygraph proved I was lying. I told them to arrest me or f*ck off. They left me alone, and found the perp three months later.

Good for you! Sometimes the best way to deal with bullies is to call their bluff! Especially if the bullies carry BADGES, which an astonishing number of bullies seem to do these days.

[Yeti]

Your derogatory and ignorant post demonstrates only one thing

One of us has irrefutibly demonstrated his ignorance today.

You are the kind of self-destructive fool that I would pitch out of my office on his ear.

I've been called self destructive often enough, but rarely a fool. And I would probably not find myself in your office, unless I needed someone to grandstand and speak falsely on my behalf. Maybe my presence in your office would indicate both foolishness and self-destructive tendencies.

Have you read any of the rest of the thread? The transcripts? If so, then by now you know that your post was both foolish and, since the esteem of intelligent freepers seems to matter to you, self-destructive.

I am not "well-connected

Regarding your candor, filing amicus briefs with the Supreme Court in Gore v. Bush .... not well connected ... hm.

enjoyed your post.

I doubt you enjoyed reading it as much as I have enjoyed posting it. And this one has been even more fun.

I noticed you didn't "refute" -- for lack of a better word -- the parts about the lynch mob @sshole and the facts of the case and all that....

I am not a "crook lawyer."

I actually meant to replace crook with well-connected, but I see that I erred and they both got through. I have no reason to believe that you are a crook, other than the fact that you are a lawyer in the first place.

[JudyB1938]

Oh, what a low blow. That is without a doubt the worst insult I've seen yet on these threads ... to call somebody Car-Vile.

[demsux]

Works for me, I couldn't give an ant's worth of piss about the "respected" congressman.

I will restrain myself, unless challenged.

[EnquiringMind]

Do you know how many LURKERS there are that think DW is
NOT GUILTY?


Here's one

[ican'tbelieveit]

Back to Dusek's closing statement about the rape scene in the motorhome with Westerfield banging Danielle's head against the headboard.

Even if it is a cloth headboard, there is something solid behind it, which would have caused bruising.

There is bug witness testimony about bugs being drawn to damaged tissue. IF there was bruising on the head, the flies would have been drawn there.

IF the flies were drawn to a damaged tissue on the head, there would be no way they would miss the openings into the skull to infest the brain cavity. Per testimony in the trial, there was little to no fly/larvae infestation in the brain cavity.

[JudyB1938]

EXCELLENT!