Skip to comments.
Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)
Union Trib ^
| August 14, 2002
| San Diego Staff
Posted on 08/13/2002 10:12:33 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 981-991 next last
To: MagnoliaMS
You're welcome... :)
I wish we could have numerous search engines one for EACH topic.
To: the Deejay
Feldman literally begged the jury to listen to the tapes.AND look at the porn
442
posted on
08/14/2002 2:34:44 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: the Deejay
And he begged them to look at the porn.
To: the Deejay
Wow!
444
posted on
08/14/2002 2:35:03 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: demsux
Great minds...
To: MagnoliaMS; Duan
To: VRWC_minion
FWIW, most CPA's I have known have absolutely no street smarts and even less common sense. and would you include yourself in that group?
To: small_l_libertarian
Not necessarily. Sometimes you have to work backwards to solve a problem.
To: demsux
Yep, that porn too. I just happened to run across
the bits about begging them to listen again to the
tapes.
I think he also asked the jury to take a good look
at the croutch shot of Danielle L. Feldman said
there's nothing porno about it. It looks like a
family photo. Nothing more. Even one of the 'puter
experts agreed with Feldman.
To: JudyB1938
Sometimes people just say stupid things for no apparent reason. I would not infer anything more than that. I have certainly done it before.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
But living it on the otherside of the garage door with the reversed lock on it is okay. No Problem.
451
posted on
08/14/2002 2:39:22 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: AppyPappy
Why is Westerfield on trial instead of someone else?Maybe they did not want to look?
I read that the detectives didn't gather evidence right . It seems they didn't take pictures as they should have before they cut the squares from the jacket and the rug.
Maybe they are trying to cover up their icompetence? Maybe one of them did it and is trying to frame him?
The little I have read that they have on him doesn't even add up to an indictment.
Westerfield was never placed in the house. But maybe she wandered outside and he grabbed her there. But they are saying he went into a house and took her, leaving no prints and she didn't have any either.What is going on here?
452
posted on
08/14/2002 2:40:16 PM PDT
by
carenot
Comment #453 Removed by Moderator
To: Jaded
Like I said..there are losers everywhere...
even a loser parent can be a victim..
To: bvw
So far, everything the jury has been requesting, are the things Feldman asked them to take a look at.
To: MagnoliaMS; Duan
To: AppyPappy
Why is Westerfield on trial?The DA charged him with murder?
457
posted on
08/14/2002 2:42:26 PM PDT
by
carenot
To: connectthedots
I have never seen that man make a stupid comment before. Ever. But maybe I was just uninformed at the time. I certainly hope this time is an isolated case. I hate it when my heroes fall off of their pedestals. :0)
To: the Deejay
I have to ask you .... did y'all figure that out on your own or did you hear it on Court TV, or on MSNBC, or on FNN, or on some San Diego TV or radio broadcast?
459
posted on
08/14/2002 2:43:27 PM PDT
by
bvw
To: the Deejay
Deejay, didn't one of the cops who was investigating early on say that the files were not porn, in his opinion?
Like the bug guy, I wondered if Feldman would put him on the stand.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 981-991 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson