Jurors To Hear Recorded Westerfield Tapes: Mudd Still Wrestling With Media! (VERDICT WATCH-Aug.14th)

Union Trib ^ | August 14, 2002 | San Diego Staff

[demsux]

Amazing you have the abililty to sum up someone based on their personal opinion on this case. Truly incredible.

Why don't you try posting my ENTIRE statement, then I will respond to your inane post.

[small_l_libertarian]

Yeah, well who believes anything Doosuk says, anyway?

[UCANSEE2]

has their been anyone in the media on Westerfields side? I was just thinking even Hannity believes he did it.

Oh, of course. I have heard others speak of hearing certain people on media saying they think DW may not be guilty, or that he is being railroaded. HOWEVER,they are few, and no one else in the media WANTS THEM ON THE AIR.

WHAT SELLS AD SPACE right now is those willing to say DW IS GUILTY AS HELL. HANG HIM. DON'T WAIT FOR THE JURY TO DECIDE.

Nancy Grace on CTV cuts off anyone that thinks DW may not be guilty.

[Freedom2specul8]

This is the best! (sorry to the rest of the contributors) :)

Not to worry, around here someone will correct you even if you are right. by dread78645

[JudyB1938]

You never heard of him? You sure must not spend much time on FR.

[demsux]

You never heard of him? You sure must not spend much time on FR.

Nice fallacy

[JudyB1938]

No, not really. He is one of the well-known & respected FReepers and has been for a long time. That's why it surprised me that you'd never heard of him.

[the Deejay]

If Doosuk told me his name is "Jeff Dusek", I wouldn't
believe him. I'd go to the county & check with them.
I'd also ask to them to prove it by his fingerprints.

If I still wasn't convinced I'd ask for DNA.

[BullDog108]

I am really confused. So is he BOTH .. a politician AND a radio personality?

I don't that is mutually exclusive. Or an oxymoron. But I am waiting for the good Congressman to get back to this thread and explain....

[L,TOWM]

Speaking as a CPA, Westerfield is guilty based on the facts and the numbers.

So our profession has devolved to accepting at face value whatever we are told?

My training included meticulously studying details and then analyzing the whole picture to see if it makes sense. Apparrently I received good training or you...

Never mind.

[UCANSEE2]

Here is another thing, that Kim has mentioned in a way.

It is amazing that we ALL can see/hear a THING, yet come away with a completely different idea of what it was.

In line with that being one of the marvels of the human race, here is a site for those that could use it. I use it every so often.

Please wipe your tears before returning

[Freedom2specul8]

wrt:my last post to you, the first sentence SHOULD have read...

"He's referring to the insinuations made by defenseduring cross examinations of the computer eggspurts."

Sorry for any confusion..

[the Deejay]

Okay, I guess I can eliminate Hannity as a possibility to
interview DW when he's gotten his acquital. Will go back to
my original possibility.....Rush Limbaugh.

[dread78645]

Not to worry, around here someone will correct you even if you are right. by dread78645

Mis-quote, I was quoting BSOD. Please change to:

Not to worry, around here someone will correct you even if you are right. by Blue Screen of Death

[Jaded]

Kim you made me do it.....

MUDD SAID IT WAS ANIME/CARTOONS

[UCANSEE2]

If I still wasn't convinced I'd ask for DNA.

Just don't send it to the SD LE labs to be tested.

[UCANSEE2]

Thanks for the note to un mis-qoute. Am sure BSOD will appreciate getting proper credit.

[the Deejay]

Oh I wouldn't send it to them. I'd find an independant
laboratory outside of Kalifornia.

[connectthedots]

Yhis is what I posted earlier regarding Congressman Billybob:

In all fairness to Congressman Billybob, he is a very busy man and likely has not followed the case nearly as closely as many who post on these threads. That said, one ought to be very careful to rush to discount his opinion about this case.

He is a very intelligent and smart lawyer who is widely known and respected throughout the legal community. If I recall correctly, Congressman Billybob was invited by the U.S. Supreme Court to submit an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in the Bush v. Gore case regarding the First Amendment issues and his brief pretty much served as the foundation of the USSC's decision and opinion.

Congressman Billybob is also part of a group of First Amendment lawyers that are working to get the unconstitutional campaign finance reform legislation declared unconstitutional.

When it comes to First Amendment issues, Congressman Billybob is THE MAN!