Posted on 08/12/2002 10:16:25 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Not to worry, around here someone will correct you even if you are right.
Brenda didn't spurn DW. DW spurned Brenda.
The only one spurned by Brenda that night was BILL LIBBY!
So why didn't they arrest HIM?
Yes and even before Feldman Dusek mentioned it in his closing I posted here that it jumped out at me and I thought it was really odd.
It sounded very much like a man that was trying not to lie. You and I would have answered very clearly "Hey no way. Not me. I wasn't ever in that house."
This is as close to asking the question "Did you do it ?" that I can think of without asking. Anyone with an IQ greater that a turnup is going to realize that anything but a no answer is going to raise concern by the police.
At the time, how did he know they didn't have a print or something that tied him to the home ? If he simply answered no and their was some proof of his presence he would be caught lying. But if instead he answered in a way that leave the door open he could manufacture some excuse that he was in garage or something to borrow a tool or something.
Maybe this is the problem with the jury system.
In case you didn't see my earlier posts I believe that Westerfeld is innocent. I did not come to this conclusion lightly either.
If I was a juror on a case like this I would make sure I was right when I had to decide the persons fate. To let an innocent go to jail means another child is in harm. Could be my child.
Really ? I remembered reading that there were two houses not searched. One was the empty home that was for sale and the other was Westerfields.
Thanks for correcting her statement....Her...sounds so removed.
Respectfully agree to disagree. It did just that on my reading of it.
Did you read it or listen to it? Other than this you seem to be saying you read this part of transcript or selection from the transcript.
I believe this is another LE misstatement. There were other neighbors who were gone that weekend.
Standing in the shadows of the garage or maybe sitting on the floor ? What am I leaving behind ? I don't get it. Even the guests that night didn't leave behind anything.
I hope the jurors notice. That's what counts.
After the big dramatic scene Dusek made over what he purposely distorted far out of context, I hope the jury recognizes his dishonesty and desperation.
He carried on as if that part of conversation was akin to a confession. Absolutely pathetic!!!!!!
Because I think its tragic for Westerfield as well as for Danielle and the parents. I wouldn't get any satisfaction from a guilty verdict, just sadness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.