No Decision From Westerfield Jury: Deliberations Continue Tuesday, August 13, 2002

KGTV ^ | August 13, 2002 | KGTV

[John Jamieson]

Please don't.

[alisasny]

About the dna taken from the childs underwear...

was it urine stains or vaginal excretion?

The reason I am asking is because my own child same age has the former occasionally as little kids are not into being very clean yet....

I am sure you have all covered this but I do not know where to find this info.

Secondly, and for the record I believe DW is innocent. I have read as much as my time would allow on this case and right now I believe beyond any doubt he is innocent.

[spectre]

OK, JJ...for you, I won't!

sw

[Freedom2specul8]

I will NOT reply in kind, just so you know. I take it all the personal attacks with a grain of salt.

[John Jamieson]

The DNA LE used to make comparisons came from her rib bone marrow. The panty DNA was used for the MH and jacket.

[Politicalmom]

You REALLY don't understand our judicial system do you? If you say "Feldman didn't create doubt" or "The jurors cried", I am going to scream.

IF the jurors convict on emotion, they are breaking the law.

Feldman doesn't have to create doubt.

[spectre]

It was her own secretions..used to identify her DNA.

sw

[small_l_libertarian]

It doesn't seem desperate at all, if it WAS Neal's. Lawson proved that at least some of it was. How is that desperate?

It seems to me that the one who is desperate is Dusek, trying to create a motive out of thin air.

[Steve0113]

was it urine stains or vaginal excretion?

The latter. It's a tell-tale sign of sexual abuse. It was used as a DNA source, which urine would not provide.

[John Jamieson]

Thanks.

[spectre]

Yeah, I just hate it when you start those personal attacks Kim...it's so upsetting...please stop.

sw

[JudyB1938]

That is so weird. I tested the link in "preview", and it worked. Do a copy and paste in a new window. It works that way. At least it did for me just now.

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Grid/6511/bub/bubbles.wav

No biggie though. It's just that the sound of bursting bubbles is so appropo to show how I feel right now.

[the Deejay]

"IF the jurors convict on emotion, they are breaking the law."

Exactly correct.

[Freedom2specul8]

The tears simply reflected TRUTH.

[tdhjohnsmom]

I think there is something more here also. Considering the fact that Brenda more or less directed LE to Westerfield, one has to wonder WHY?

[KnutCase]

If you check transcripts I think you will find that police forensics found numerous other DNA in Danielle's bedroom that was not Danielle's. All they said was that other DNA found in Danielle's bedroom excluded Westerfield. Why no followup on other DNA??? A real mystery to me.

[bvw]

If she has a Qualcomm phone, who knows?

[the Deejay]

Got it to work. LOL It sounds like one of my
toilets (at times.)

[ItsOurTimeNow]

"Why no followup on other DNA???"

Because it didn't fit the DA's neat little fabricated case.