Skip to comments.
Westerfield Closings Set For Tuesday, 8-6-2002: More Revelations Continue "Out" Of Jurors Sight!
Court TV ^
| August 6, 2002
| Harriet Ryan
Posted on 08/06/2002 6:40:14 AM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,061-1,065 next last
To: UCANSEE2
Judge Mudd told the jury, IF he kidnapped her, then he killed her that is how you must find. If he killed her, then he kidnapped her, that is how you must find. What if he suffocated her in her bed and carted off a dead body?....what if she ran away from her dipsh!t parents and wandered down the street at 2am and DW hit her in a drunkin' state after his nite out at Dad's...he pick's up the dead body and cart's it off to the desert.....no kidnapping in either instance.....The prosecution has done such a P!SS POOR job of proving what happened that i would not vote to convict in a million years!!!
221
posted on
08/06/2002 10:47:08 AM PDT
by
is_is
To: All
HUH? BVD was "distressed" in that 911 call? Excuse me, but I'd never heard a person sound so "calm".
To: UCANSEE2
Judge Mudd told the jury, IF he kidnapped her, then he killed her that is how you must find. If he killed her, then he kidnapped her, that is how you must find. What if he suffocated her in her bed and carted off a dead body?....what if she ran away from her dipsh!t parents and wandered down the street at 2am and DW hit her in a drunkin' state after his nite out at Dad's...he pick's up the dead body and cart's it off to the desert.....no kidnapping in either instance.....The prosecution has done such a P!SS POOR job of proving what happened that i would not vote to convict in a million years!!!
Gives me another thought!!! WHAT IF BRENDA OR ONE OF HER "FRIENDS" RAN OVER HER THAT NIGHT BECAUSE THEY WERE ALL DRUNK AND DRUGGED??????????????????????
223
posted on
08/06/2002 10:48:37 AM PDT
by
is_is
To: spectre
But, but...didn't he promise to show us how it was done in opening arguments? Oh well..nevermind.
sw
224
posted on
08/06/2002 10:48:38 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: spectre
He doesn't have to prove a darn thing if the Jury is STUPID and convicts on emotionsThe jury, the media, the reading and listening publice, YES, and the word is past tense, CONVICTED on EMOTION. DID so the first day they arrested DW, possibly before.
To: demsux
Here's how....
**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**
**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**FREE NINJA DAVE**
Remember the Jury Prayer, they could use it more than just daily... Stealth Ninja Dave
226
posted on
08/06/2002 10:51:11 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: UCANSEE2
"Somebody broke into that house and got her...goofy little puppy who would slobber all over you"..
NO ONE BROKE into that house, Mr. Dusek. NO ONE.
sw
227
posted on
08/06/2002 10:51:11 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: is_is
The prosecution has done such a P!SS POOR job of proving what happened that i would not vote to convict in a million years!!! You wouldn't. Because you are intelligent and have gone to the trouble to evaluate all the information for yourself instead of having it spoon fed to you by the media in order to sell advertising time/space.
See post 225
To: spectre
DUSEK IS TRULY INSANE....Unbelieveable...
To: connectthedots
Kidnapped until she was dead. DewPointDufus.
230
posted on
08/06/2002 10:52:29 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: It's me
About surfing porn.
231
posted on
08/06/2002 10:53:02 AM PDT
by
Jaded
To: spectre
DUSEK. A VEXATION to the SPIRIT.
To: spectre
Dusek is jumpimg around so much, how in the world could he claim that he would help the jury 'get organized'?
I don't disagree that she was kidnapped and killed, but that doesn't mean DW did it.
Dusek keeps mentioning what he doesn't have to prove. This is a big mistake since it is like a beacon drawing attention to the problems of the prosecution.
To: UCANSEE2
Did I hear correctly or is he GUESSING as to how DW entered the DW home and made off with Danielle? Either by the side gate and sliding door or thru the garage side door? I thought he was going to present evidence not guesses to the jury.
234
posted on
08/06/2002 10:54:25 AM PDT
by
nycgal
To: FresnoDA
He is INSANE. He keeps repeating that it doesn't matter how she was taken, how she was killed...none of that matters...she was just killed!
Fres, I need to walk around a little, this guy is bringing out the worst in me..
sw
235
posted on
08/06/2002 10:55:15 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: All
Well, folks, I've been just sitting here listening to this nutcake and shaking my head & rolling my eyes at what he's saying. Everything he's saying, is just incomprehensible.
To: FresnoDA
Feldman can pretty much cut his closing argument in half. Dusek is helping DW with his closing argument.
To: spectre
Yeah right Dusek...big ole WESTIE...crammed inside of Danielle's closet for hours, waiting for his chance to jump out and take little Danielle.
OK, that's it....case closed....
Next stop....
San Quentin/so
To: spectre
Amazing how they never think maybe NO ONE broke in..... that it could have been one of the "someone's" already IN the house who took her, especially since they have no idea, supposedly, exactly WHEN she disappeared.
To: nycgal
He's "guessing". He's GUESSING about the entire case. Beginning to end. Dusek is just horrible.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 1,061-1,065 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson