Skip to comments.
Evidence On Insects Likely To Continue: (Westerfield Trial "Creeps" Along At An Ant's Pace!)
Union Trib ^
| June 29, 2002
| Alex Roth
Posted on 07/28/2002 8:56:21 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 741-758 next last
To: cyncooper
I beg your pardon, cyn. They wanted to start with Goff last week and his schedule conflict delayed it until tomorrow.
Nice try though. You ought to sign up for the prosecution team to help them mislead as much as possible.
To: Mrs.Liberty
My thoughts are with you. I'm working too, but at home.
Look at it this way. Our evenings have been beautiful and you can enjoy that later. :)
To: shezza
two to three weeks!!! Two or THREE weeks? Where are you getting "three" weeks?
To: connectthedots
believe the prosecution theory is bug activity delayed until animal activity took place, opening the body up and making it attractive to insects at that timeThe body was already "opened up"...Haskell made a very valid point, that the human body's natural orifices ARE A PRIME area of entry for insects, mummified or not.
104
posted on
07/29/2002 10:30:13 AM PDT
by
demsux
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
...to help them mislead as much as possible.I'll leave that to the defense.
To: demsux
You are referring to a statement of mine. Remember the natural orifices of the head were not entered by large amounts of insects.
To: cyncooper
YOu're right. Mea culpa. I meant to say 2 weeks to 18 days. Sorry to cause you confusion.
107
posted on
07/29/2002 10:34:10 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: cyncooper
Sorry, I didn't see who connect was quoting...will refrain from this type of behavior
108
posted on
07/29/2002 10:34:11 AM PDT
by
demsux
To: shezza
Sorry to cause you confusion.No confusion on my part. Feb 2 plus 14 days = Feb 16 which was Faulkner's date, correct? You are the one who stated "three weeks" which is a 21 day period.
To: cyncooper
I see you couldn't defend your claim of only a one day delay, so you jump to a pointless remark.
It's sort of like the pictures of the marks on Westerfield's forearm. Could you remind me again of what the prosecution proved with those "ominous" pictures? I seem to have missed it.
Yessiree.....you would do well with Mr. Dusek.
To: demsux
...will refrain from this type of behavior.Please quote away. I just didn't want connectthedots to think you thought he said it. No prob.
To: cyncooper
I said no such thing. Disagree all you want. And I reserve every right to disagree with you, which I do most of the time. :o)
Hugzzz & Kizzezzz!
(Just kidding!)
112
posted on
07/29/2002 10:38:29 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: cyncooper
They wanted Goff there thurs, but he couldn't get their till mon. (friday didn't count) am trying to figure out..how many court days are involved in your discussion with south.
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
It's sort of like the pictures of the marks on Westerfield's forearm. Could you remind me again of what the prosecution proved with those "ominous" pictures? I seem to have missed it.I don't believe the pictures of the marks on DW's arms were brought into trial. Just the PH, iirc. I don't believe they entered them due to lack of forensic evidence. I've not commented on them.
As to my "pointless" remark. You think Dusek is misleading, I think Feldman is. And never the twain shall meet.
To: cyncooper
their = there
To: cyncooper
Too busy to "play" in fres's sandbox today... Hope to see ya onight.
To: cyncooper
tonight.
To: cyncooper
No confusion on my part. Feb 2 plus 14 days = Feb 16 which was Faulkner's date, correct? You are the one who stated "three weeks" which is a 21 day period.Oooooh, semantics, is it? Okay, try this equation. Haskell said she could have been put there as late as Feb. 21. She disappeared the evening of Feb. 1. How many days is it from Feb. 1 to Feb. 21? I get 20, which is almost 3 weeks. So I should have said, according to your literal interpretation, "two weeks to 20 days," not "two to three weeks," right?
118
posted on
07/29/2002 10:43:59 AM PDT
by
shezza
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
They wanted Goff there thurs, but he couldn't get their till mon. (friday didn't count) I don't think Goff could get there today, not until tomorrow. Thursday was a full day with Rodriguez anyway, who was foundation for Goff. So my reckoning is Goff delayed one day--Monday to Tuesday.
No big deal, Feldman may or may not get his surrebuttal witness.
To: cyncooper
Just the PH, iirc. Yep........The PH is a great place to mislead and legally plant ideas that can taint potential jurors.
It is still misleading and very wrong when a man's life is in the balance.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 741-758 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson