In this sort of thing you are guilty until proven innocent, even though it wouldn’t even be a crime if it was the other way around.
“Blood in the streets in the town of New Haven.”
its not about evidence
its the seriousness of the charges
the process is the punishment
anyone get fired?
i think not
it was intentional
I don’t think it is illegal to call someone names.
I don’t think slander would apply to some schmo on the street insulting another.
Feelings, nothing more than feelings.
I think that cases like this, where the defendant is proven innocent, the plaintiff should pay all of the defendant’s legal costs associated with the case. It think this might lessen the number of “nuisance cases” that currently clog the courts.
So then nothing happened to the racist…………..parking attendant?
So then nothing happened to the racist…………..parking attendant?
In my world I have moved toward not speaking to anyone who is not in my circle.
Hate crime laws were created to criminalize anything a White says or does, or doesn’t say or doesn’t do, and to set free non-Whites who assault Whites.
Donald Trump is the 21st century spiritual incarnation of Abraham Lincoln.
The woke leftist Democrat Party is the continuation of the misguided postulations of Stephen Douglas and the rest of the 19th century advocates of slavery.
The ongoing debates on the internet, television, et al. between Trump and the misguided "woke" leftist Democrats et al. are a replay of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
This is hardly surprising.
President Trump leads the Republican Party, the Party of Lincoln.
The "woke" leftist Democrats lead the Democrat Party, the party of slavery, the ku klux klan, the Trail of Tears, infanticide, election fraud, political corruption, racism, hate, and evil.
The battle lines are clearly drawn. The choice is between good and evil.
The American People must make this choice today just as the American People were faced with the choice between freedom and slavery in the mid-19th century.
-- West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943)
“You low-down no-good racist slur!”
So this lady was arrested for supposedly saying a naughty word. Let’s say she did say it (although she didn’t). That should get her banned from the property. But arrested? Nope.
I don’t know who first made the comment below. But he/she is very wise.
The First Amendment is meant to protect unpopular behavior. And that’s because popular behavior needs no protection.
The problem is, ANYONE can accuse anyone else of hurting their feelings.
The left even goes as far as *Silence is Violence*.
So whether you speak or not, someone’s feelings are allegedly getting hurt.
Been this way in the UK for some time now. But America has a 1st Amendment, and if the shitstains on the SC will do their job, we won’t have the problem here.
The existence of Yale hurts my feelings. Shut it down.
Bogus headline. What happened isn’t about free speech. It’s about how white people are not only often the victims of racism but are also frequently falsely accused of it.