Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘He Ain’t Built S**t’: Elon Musk Takes a Shot at Peter Navarro Over Defense of Trump Tariffs
Mediaite ^ | April 5, 2025 | Zachary Leaman

Posted on 04/05/2025 10:43:07 AM PDT by Miami Rebel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: 9YearLurker

Me too. Classless move on Musk’s part. If he has an issue with Navarro or tariffs, and he clearly does, don’t vomit it up in public and reveal dissension in the ranks. Pathetic.


41 posted on 04/05/2025 2:28:59 PM PDT by spacejunkie2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

“production of the famous T-34 tank was moved 2,000 km from Kharkov to the Stalin-Ural railcar factory at Niznhy Tagil, Sverdlovsk, under the leadership of its designer, Alexander Morizov. This involved moving 30,000 workers and dependents, and 10,000 machine tools. They were all boxed up and moved east.”

“Workers re-assembling a steel works at Chelyabinsk were given just 75 days to restart production. This involved laying railway tracks, re-assembling 18 machine shops and connecting compressed air supplies. Starting with frozen ground, working round the clock, and living in tents, the workers achieved the task in 56 days.”

“Chelyabinsk became home to the world’s largest tank factory.”

“In addition to the removal and re-assembly of the factories, the Soviets also built 3,500 factories from scratch from 1942 to 1946, which equates to 750 a year.”

https://www.left-horizons.com/2021/10/08/eighty-years-ago-evacuation-of-soviet-war-factories/


42 posted on 04/05/2025 3:37:07 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man; Miami Rebel

I hope everyone can see that democrats, the MSM, RINOs, and anti Trumpers are very busy trying to make it look as though the admin is in disarray.

And you, Miami Rebel, post this kind of crap whenever it pops up somewhere.

I can only guess where your loyalty lies.


43 posted on 04/05/2025 3:42:05 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Amnesty


44 posted on 04/05/2025 3:46:09 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (It's hard not to celebrate the fall of bad people. - Bongino)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

Lebanon and the lack of a forceful response to the Marine barrack bombing.


45 posted on 04/05/2025 3:47:36 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel
“everything’s going to be fine,” especially if the media “calms down” over plummeting stocks

"Especially if", huh? Fat chance of that.

46 posted on 04/05/2025 3:50:08 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Assez de mensonges et de phrases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

If you disprove that for months on end Elon Musk’s every utterance has been greeted with waves of adulation on FR, I’ll never post again.

If you find my own opinions repulsive, I get it. But if you deem those of one of the towering avatars of MAGA to be suddenly unworthy of sharing, that’s on you.


47 posted on 04/05/2025 4:47:12 PM PDT by Miami Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Miami Rebel

I bet this incident or quote is taken out of context somewhere.


48 posted on 04/06/2025 9:22:18 AM PDT by Nifty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifty

‘ I bet this incident or quote is taken out of context somewhere.’

You’d lose that bet.


49 posted on 04/06/2025 9:26:24 AM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

I do not question the need to innovate.

Subsidizing businesses - in any way - does not lead to innovation and invokes a financial excuse to not innovate, for if competition gets even greater the political interest will be to just subsidize you more.

Purely reciporocal tariffs would be fine, but many of the reently announced tariffs are not really reciprocal and in some cases, on comparison of tariffs, are not really about tariffs, but merely an attempt tp punish trade deficits alone. In some cases some trade deficits we have are not to our disadvantage at all, and provide materials we are in short supply of that greatly aid our domestic producers, and come from countries whose meager economies have no need for our expensive goods. Yet, we want to punish them for buying less from us than we can sell to them, even though in some circumstances the exchange serves us well.


50 posted on 04/06/2025 11:45:26 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Wuli
Wow, the globalism is strong in you. BTW I think globalists are on the same level as lawyers and the MSM.
51 posted on 04/06/2025 11:47:39 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: central_va

It’s not about “globalism”, it’s about tariffs done right versus done wrong.


52 posted on 04/06/2025 11:50:05 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Wuli

“Right” would be the 10% across the board tariff plus additional levies to counter past abusive trade practices. Oh wait, that is exactly what the GOAT POTUS is doing!!


53 posted on 04/06/2025 11:55:56 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Right” would be the 10% across the board tariff plus additional levies to counter past abusive trade practices. Oh wait, that is exactly what the GOAT POTUS is doing!!”

No, it is not.

They are taking the inaccurate position that a “trade deficit” - any trade deficit, no matter how small the country (tiny in some cases) is the result of tariffs and or non-tariff barriers, and adding a factor drawn just from a “trade deficit” added on top of any tariff. In some cases the other country is not imposing greater tariffs on us, but has a trade deficit - we want more of their stuff compared to what of ours they want - and that’s all. In some cases it is not tariffs or non tariff barriers at all that has produced a trade deficit, but merely what each side has considered a fair exchange of only what each wants from the other.


54 posted on 04/06/2025 12:08:53 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson