Posted on 02/28/2025 9:00:00 PM PST by ransomnote
I’m wondering if Pres. Trump can get around all this by declaring each a national security issue and then make it confidential or secret or top secret....
just ran across this
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/12/exclusive-kelsey-pritchard-the-stakes-couldnt-be-higher-for-trump-and-america-in-wisconsins-supreme-court-race/
(this race will decide wheter or not trumps agenda can contiune,if we lose we lose tw0 house seats and rule by only one seat) from the link: Like Trump, Brad Schimel believes judges should apply the law, not make the law. As Schimel says in his recent ad, Wisconsinites should decide abortion policy in the state, not an activist court. As attorney general under former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Schimel had a solid record of respecting the Constitution and the distinct roles of the three branches of government. He also understands the value of life as a father with two adopted daughters.
Conversely, Susan Crawford is a radical judge with an abortion activist track record. Planned Parenthood was a client of Crawford’s, and she represented them in court. She fought against a law for women’s safety requiring abortion businesses to have hospital admitting privileges. She also represented the abortion industry in fighting a law to prevent women from being coerced into abortions. Crawford has been publicly grieving the end of Roe v. Wade, the case that is responsible for the deaths of 63 million unborn babies. Maybe most disturbingly of all, she uses the same euphemisms as the abortion industry, calling abortion “health care.”
Because Wisconsin voters elected a Republican legislature, the pro-abortion lobby hopes to use the Wisconsin Supreme Court to circumvent the will of the people and allow for abortion without limits.
The Democrats have wholeheartedly embraced Crawford’s extremist history and are campaigning based on her clear messages of how she will rule in abortion cases. This mirrors their efforts two years ago when the party lined up behind the liberal Supreme Court candidate Janet Protasiewicz who ran her campaign almost completely on the issue of abortion. Following the Protasiewicz model, Crawford has been working closely with Democrats. She headlined a Democrat fundraising call last month that called for more investments into her race to “put to more House seats in play.”
Since last week, Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America’s Women Speak Out field team has been deploying student canvassers to speak with Wisconsin voters at their doorsteps about showing up on April 1 to vote for Brad Schimel.
We’re investing in this race at a time that state supreme court elections matter more than ever. Thanks to the Dobbs decision, the people now have the ability to protect life through their elected officials at every level. If we have activist courts, however, we’re at risk of having mini Roe decisions all across the country that prevent states from saving unborn children.
Lives depend upon Brad Schimel defeating Susan Crawford on April 1. Wisconsin voters must show up on April 1 as they did last November for Trump.
Kelsey Pritchard is the Political Communications Director for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life
Pro-abortion activists gather outside the Marquette Lubar Center before a Wisconsin Supreme Court debate between candidates Brad Schimel and Susan Crawford on March 12, 2025, in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)
From your Snow White post..
To: bitt
Here’s the polar opposite, in terms of “wokeness.”|
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/4303867/posts?page=55#55 posted on 3/12/2025, 8:09:11 PM by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
I don’t remember this Merry Melodie. Watch to the very end, the bit about the ded snow white, the ‘little’ soldier, the army, then pan back to the ‘memmie’ at the fire and subtly sporting horns.
In plain sight. 1943. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0035743/
That report is disputed and there is no valid source.
EO is not on the White House site nor is it in the Federal Register...yet
thanks. i just went to the WH site and the Federal Register site and it is in neither.
Climate Group Controlled By Bill Gates Hit By Layoffs
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/climate-group-controlled-bill-gates-hit-layoffs
.
Or he could just point to The Constitution and tell the Judge(s) to kick rocks. Go ahead and try to enforce it.
As I wrote, “Time will tell.”
I don’t see an EO published, but there is this memorandum:
Ensuring the Enforcement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c)
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/ensuring-the-enforcement-of-federal-rule-of-civil-procedure-65c/
I don’t see an EO published, but there is this memorandum:
Ensuring the Enforcement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c)
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/03/ensuring-the-enforcement-of-federal-rule-of-civil-procedure-65c/
As stated up-thread, this is FAKE NEWS.
You’re welcome.
I thought the insignia and ranks were the same in Canada and Britain and Charles IS our King. Department of Defense Ministers and the occasional military Commander have fussed with the uniform from time to time, but my current understanding is that they’re the same or similar. It’s not a subject I’m an expert on for sure. Having said that, and in light of our formal though largely symbolic ties to GB, I doubt there could be an absorption of Canada by the US or anyone else without the express permission or at least blessing of Great Britain.
Sure and begorrah! ...and a Dragon Rampant! sigh
Happy St Paddy's Day❗
Whisky?
Not a common spelling here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.