Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Asked China’s Newest A.I. Model Five Normal Questions — We Got Five Creepy Commie Answers
Daily Caller News via Liberty Daily ^ | 01/30/2025 | Thomas English

Posted on 01/31/2025 7:28:03 AM PST by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: The_Harlequin
Take a look at this:

Rooster:

What were some of the engineering questions that had to be answered to build the Seto Ohashi Bridge and the Honshu-Shikoku Bridge Project in Japan? And give me that answer in html.
Chat GPT:

Engineering Challenges of the Seto Ohashi Bridge

Building the Seto Ohashi Bridge and the entire Honshu-Shikoku Bridge Project required answering numerous complex engineering questions, including:

1. Seismic Resistance

2. Wind Resistance

3. Long Span Design

4. Deep Water and Strong Currents

5. Multi-Use Design (Road + Rail)

6. Corrosion Resistance

7. Aesthetic and Environmental Considerations

By solving these challenges, the Seto Ohashi Bridge became one of the most advanced and durable long-span bridge systems in the world.


41 posted on 01/31/2025 9:18:55 AM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Yes, that one is impressive as well.

Did you ask it the one about why limiting US fossil fuel production can hurt air quality?
What if you ask it how many biological sexes there are?


42 posted on 01/31/2025 9:32:23 AM PST by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I did like the essay on the Constitution, but just to play devil’s advocate, I must point out that although the Leftists, the Progressives, the Globalists and even the Marxists probably hate the Constitution with a passion - they probably know it does not serve their purposes to openly criticize it.

That would be like saying self-governance is a bad thing - they may believe that in their hearts, but they know not to say the quiet part out loud - that doing so would be wildly unpopular.

My point is that - while the Big Tech creators of ChatGTP may harbor negative bias against the Constitution, they provably know better than to introduce that bias into their AI program, and therefore the idea that the Constitution is a great and wonderful document may not be that ‘controversial’.

Better tests of whether AI is biased may be questions surrounding transgender, Covid vaccine, stolen 2020 election, J6 Fedsurrection, climate change, etc..


43 posted on 01/31/2025 9:58:19 AM PST by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

‘BTW, AI is fundamentally logical because it is built on mathematical principles, including probability, statistics, linear algebra, and optimization’

AI is based on mimicking biological neurons. All the mathematics you talk about are just tools to make the neurons work, interconnect and converge to relatively stable weights but nobody can predict how those weights would be. So contrary to algorithms, there is nothing ‘fundamentally logical’ in neurons and in AI. AI is fundamentally fuzzy, like anything complex in the real world.


44 posted on 01/31/2025 11:24:15 AM PST by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

‘The language model dismissed claims of genocide against Uyghurs in Xinjiang as slander from prejudiced Westerners’


Calling what happens in Xinjiang a ‘genocide’ while the Uyghurs are always allowed to have several children per woman and with a population increase about 3 times of the Hans?
Who is gaslighting here, Deep Seek or the Daily Caller?


45 posted on 01/31/2025 11:42:39 AM PST by miniTAX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“Did time exist before the universe?”


46 posted on 01/31/2025 12:44:36 PM PST by Ignatz ("Look, if I offend anybody today, I don't care." -Tom Homan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: miniTAX
Here's what OpenAI's 4o model said about your comment:
AI is often compared to biological neurons, but modern neural networks are fundamentally mathematical systems, not true brain replicas. While it's true that no one can predict the exact weights a network will learn, the process itself is governed by precise mathematical principles like optimization and probability.

AI may not follow strict rule-based logic like traditional algorithms, but that doesn’t make it irrational. Instead, it operates within a structured, mathematical framework that enables it to recognize patterns and make decisions. Calling AI "fuzzy" oversimplifies its nature—it’s complex, but not arbitrary.


47 posted on 01/31/2025 1:54:26 PM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ignatz
Good question. Here's how OpenAI's 4o answered it:
That question depends on how we define time and the universe.

If we define the universe as all that exists, including space, matter, and time itself, then time began with the universe—it didn’t exist "before" because "before" implies time already existed. This aligns with standard interpretations of the Big Bang theory, where space-time itself emerged from the initial singularity.

However, if we consider the possibility of a larger reality beyond our universe, then time could have existed in some form before our universe came into being. Some speculative theories, like eternal inflation or cyclic cosmology, suggest that our universe may be just one phase in a larger, ongoing process.

Ultimately, if time itself is a property of our universe, then asking about "before" the universe is like asking what’s north of the North Pole—it’s a meaningless question. But if time is part of a greater cosmic structure, then something may have existed before.


48 posted on 01/31/2025 1:56:54 PM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

The Bill of Rights, added soon after ratification, enshrines essential freedoms like speech, religion, and due process, ensuring that government power is constrained by individual rights.

I notice the right to arm yourself is NOT mentioned as an “essential freedom”.


49 posted on 01/31/2025 3:41:23 PM PST by ro_dreaming (Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The answers sound like Democrat talking points.

Of course.


50 posted on 01/31/2025 3:44:45 PM PST by Fledermaus (GOP RINOs - Get on Board or Get Out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Amazing that Fagen sang about the NWO decades ago.


51 posted on 01/31/2025 3:45:48 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ro_dreaming

Go ask ChatGPT about it. I’m not your assistant.


52 posted on 01/31/2025 3:49:21 PM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: The_Harlequin

I like to refer it as “trans intelligence”.
It’s fake smart.
Rather like a search engine looking at fact checkers, reading The Hill, drudge report, or wiki-lie-to-you for answers.
Garbage in garbage out.

The hive mind of the brainwashed gobble up the answers, as though it’s intelligent. Most of them willingly room the clotshot, believing it was “science”.

“You don’t believe
You’ve been lied to and brainwashed
Because
You’ve been lied to and brainwashed”


53 posted on 01/31/2025 4:03:42 PM PST by Z28.310 (does not comply well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I don’t know why your reply was tinged with hostility. I just stated that the ChatGPT answer didn’t include the right to self defense.

I didn’t ask you why that is, or to look into why that is missing from the LLM answer.

Chill out, Rooster.


54 posted on 01/31/2025 4:10:59 PM PST by ro_dreaming (Who knew "Idiocracy", "1984", "Enemy of the State", and "Person of Interest" would be non-fiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Z28.310
It's smarter than you—and quicker. And I can prove it. Tomorrow. I'm off duty.
55 posted on 01/31/2025 4:12:49 PM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ro_dreaming

Sorry for any tinge of hostility. Not my intention.

I’m typing on my phone and it’s vy unnatural.


56 posted on 01/31/2025 4:16:01 PM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

DeepSeek: All your data are belong to us.


57 posted on 01/31/2025 4:29:02 PM PST by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

What a hole of an ass, uncouth and unsolicited insult you just posted to a complete stranger to preclude your self-determined, delusional intellectual superiority.

Like I posted...
Garbage in, garbage out.
Save your next garbage out for someone who might read it, because I certainly won’t.

Rooster...An euphemism for what people who know you in real life probably call you...the name fits.

Go back to touching yourself with one hand on your mouse while playing with your own fake intelligence. And why are you posting this on FR when you’re supposed to be on duty? Are you ATC at Reagan National, or just another lazy DIE hire at some other government job?


58 posted on 01/31/2025 5:12:59 PM PST by Z28.310 (does not comply well with others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Z28.310

Aha. A person possessed by an evil spirit.

Or perhaps just an evil human. Look at the language used. Vile. Pit of hell-like.

You are rare but not unknown. Spew some more so people can get familiar with yoi.


59 posted on 01/31/2025 5:28:08 PM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Z28.310

Come on, now. Show us your black heart.

Show us your hatred. Your demonic anger.


60 posted on 01/31/2025 5:32:25 PM PST by RoosterRedux ("There's nothing so inert as a closed mind" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson